I commented on Ralph Diorio when you posted it the first time.
Here's one example of "miracles" that people swear by, most notably Catholics, regarding the alleged healing properties of the water at Lourdes, France:
http://www.miraclehunter.com/marian_apparitions/approved_apparitions/lourdes/miracles1.html
In 1859, Professor Vergez of the Faculty of Medicine at Montpellier was appointed to examine the cures. Seven cures were recorded before 1862 promoting the argument for the recognition of the Apparitions by Bishop Laurence.
Almost 7,000 cureshave been documented at the waters of Lourdes. The Church has vigorously investigated and validated a mere 67 of them.Lourdes has 6 to 9 million pilgrims per year
---
Since the mid to late 19th century there have been tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions, of visits by the religious to Lourdes, France. Out of that spectacularly large number, the Catholic Church has certified a mere 67 as being legitimate "miracles" (in its opinion).
Think about this: For argument's sake let's say the waters do indeed have miraculous healing powers bestowed on them by Jesus Christ or a saint (as is the claim). Are a miniscule 67 "healings" out of tens of millions of attempts really impressive at all? At best, it's a dismal failure. Doctors have enormously better success percentages than that.
Put in monetary terms, if you invested $100 million into something and your return was only $67, would you be impressed?
Even IF we could attribute, with incontrovertible evidence, those 67 healings to a god, why has he ignored millions and millions of people who went to Lourdes for healing, who were equally, if not more, faithful and devoted as the 67? And, you can be sure, those people are wholly devoted to praying to the god that did nothing for them.
At best, it betrays god as fickle, arbitrary, unjust and unreliable.