I know the intent is different--you fully intended to purchase and Lisa had no such intention with the toy--but the act is the same.
Teejay, if you have a point to make, you sure do know how to obscure it.
since it is not a merchandizing law not to touch merchandize unless we plan to buy, was Lisa wrong in allowing her child to hold the bear?
If you traveled to a place where there were no laws, would it be wrong to murder someone?
If it is only a principle and not a law violated, why did the retail clerk make such a harsh judgment and her subsequent demand?
You need to ask the clerk about that.
I may have misunderstood that you were condemning Lisa for allowing her child to hold the bear.
I am. She was wrong to do so.
COMF
PS Anybody sensing something missing from the story? Like... how did the clerk know Lisa didn't intend to buy the bear?
Come, fill the cup, and in the fire of spring
Your winter-garment of repentance fling:
The bird of Time has but a little way
To flutter--and the bird is on the wing.