Heaven'sgate11,
You stated:
Data Dog.
To have a discussion or debate within your narrative,we would first have to admit however you view the discussion the end game would be the same. The variations on arguments would lead to more questions than answers. The medium you placed at hand has several analogies’ that must be adhered to 100%. That scenario is not probable unless you equate man to Christ. I understand you wish to have a Jehovah’s Witness defend its credo, but under that framework, it would be impossible for any religion to defend its faith 100%. Should this discussion also include associations of Jehovah’s Witnesses that have been acknowledged but not representative of, on present doctrines?
Welcome, and good points.
#1) That criteria is NOT mine. It is from the JWs own Governing Body/Faithful Slave. It is the criteria that they claim to meet in all of their beliefs. Just listen to the 'God's Word is Truth' District convention if you can stand it.
#2)" Then End game would be the same." Yes it would. No religion can say that their cutomized beliefs meet the criteria of "truth." That being said, I am not concerned with the rest because they are not making the incredible claims made by the WTBTS.
#3) More questions than answers... That's life, and that's ok in my book. Those who think they have all the answers are kidding themselves, and those who persecute others for not accepting their "answers" condemn themselves, IMO. I am just asking a JW to explain their beliefs with their own criteria, given by their own gurus. If they only have "interpretations" that may not be correct, how are they any different than anyone else? Why should anyone be DF'd or marked/repressed for not agreeing with the "answers" they provide.
The ancient prophet Datamonius Cannis is reported to have said, " It only matters what YOU do."
DD