Atheists, here is a 'balls' question ---even for all--- (page 15)

prologos

twitch, the planetary spacings, that I worked on for twenty years in the most beautiful surroundings [like heisenberg if you know the de-tails] I consider facts, trusting the published data. the b&T explanation or measurement was partial.

The corelation between solar resonances are evident, are they DIRECT causes? a hidden domain? consider

the lagrangian points 60 degrees, that is at the RADIUS distance, before and after Jupiter, the Trojan asteroids,( and other bodies) this is compatible with resonance NODES based on the orbit radius, (with its roots in the T&B idea) of course garvity is involved, but it seems to have a wave character.

your questions? I will get into that. i am jittery to read all, because I like to keep it positive, upbuilding.

prologos

Twitch: on all your posts:

Theist proof of grand design? perhaps a hidden agenda in the back of my mind? Yes, I would like to elicit enlightened comments on that. my -self: I believe in a creator-worker, for I have struggled all my life with that in various ways. but I conceive the Creator or caring Creatriss as so superior, that any resulting structure, like the 10 planet regularity was a buid-in possibility from the first shove into action-time.

Musical notes at certain intervals.? yes, it is the intervals in the planetary spacings that are the clue.

For an upcoming presentation at the local Astronomy society I am trying to prepare a striking handout. I have made multiple charts, ruler-like of the spacings in real proportion, about 1mm to the bode no.-- 10 mm for earth orbit. sun to pluto fits on a legal sheet.

IF you reverse these strips, it is striking that the lines [overlapp]* no, ALIGN again and again. So these notes are NODES areas where in a chladni plate, matter would congregate for lack of vibrations, and the system is TUNED.

* reverting to wtspeak, overlapping not.

Music of the spheres revisited.

Movies? Beautiful mind? at my age, Movies, linked videos go to fast. give me the written text.

just venting.

Caedes

a pretty good profile of my past can be made from my posts, so when I said "pushing 90" that generation technically includes you too, but I am not the 'generation' but generating business. let me restae that then : I can form a truthfull sentence that has in it a nine as it's first number. (sic)

I would say a pretty good profile of your present can be made from your posts; i.e. you are a lying troll. I could not care less what age you are and neither could anyone else here I suspect, what those comments tell everyone is that you are not truthful and that you are only here to troll and not to have a sensible debate or conversation.

Personally I doubt that you could form a truthful statement if your alleged daughters life depended on it. See your next quote for more that I would strongly suspect to be lies.

the planetary spacings, that I worked on for twenty yearsin the most beautiful surroundings [like heisenberg if you know the de-tails] (sic)

Oh really! This is like reading the watchtower, they can never come out and say what they really mean either.

prologos

Caedes, I thought that you at least had read Heisenberg's biography or excerpts, to know when, & in what circumstances during "a miraculous week" he came upon his major insights.

You know that only so much personal information can be presented here, but if LIVES depended on it, you could alsways E-mail.

Can you define troll --for me? --by example? --because

I find that drole.

But for you to picture it, I spend better part of two years on a hot tropical island near the beach, newly mariied, with a calculator, ruler, cicle-calipers, and copies of reams of astronomical charts, copies I had made in Honolulu. some old charts that were not in Miles, not Metric format. and the number

186 000 came up more than once. I was on to something.

just having charts can do wonders. google T Brahe/ J Kepler.

Viviane

so, with help from junior, here is a TYPICAL science graph with the 5% scattering of data about an established rule.

Well now you have to explain the chart and how 5% scattering of data means that a law that makes predictions will be off by 5%. You still have all of your work to do...

BSW. the "pushing - 90" remark is also close to the 5% uncertainty margin. but the "2 year old"- is actually 2.208 my fourfold error.

just to show how silly , hollow your objections are.

You simply aren't telling the truth and got caught.

within 5 %: all 10 major orbits in our planetary disk can be found with these parameters:

starting at .4 AU. with orbit radius difference not smaller than .3AU,

A DOUBLING from planet to planet. but

orbital gap not to exceed 9.6 AU.

Which means nothing because that's not what Bode-Titius hypothesis predicted, it's just what is observed (and not even correctly as I had to do some of your math for you when you were way off).

You still haven't proven anything and all your work is ahead of you.

Viviane

the lagrangian points 60 degrees, that is at the RADIUS distance, before and after Jupiter, the Trojan asteroids,( and other bodies) this is compatible with resonance NODES based on the orbit radius, (with its roots in the T&B idea) of course garvity is involved, but it seems to have a wave character.

A meaningless mashup of astronomy terms with nothing to back it up.

For an upcoming presentation at the local Astronomy society I am trying to prepare a striking handout. I have made multiple charts, ruler-like of the spacings in real proportion, about 1mm to the bode no.-- 10 mm for earth orbit. sun to pluto fits on a legal sheet.

Is it comedy night?

snare&racket

Viviane scares me......

Prologos, please don't do it...... astronomy societies are likely to know alot about......astronomy.

Viviane

Why do I scare you?

Caedes

Caedes, I thought that you at least had read Heisenberg's biography or excerpts, to know when, & in what circumstances during "a miraculous week" he came upon his major insights.

Why would you think that, liar? I don't read biographies, I do read science textbooks. If you do read biographies that would certainly explain your appalling lack of knowledge of even basic science and how it is achieved.

You know that only so much personal information can be presented here, but if LIVES depended on it, you could alsways E-mail. (sic)

No, thanks. Why would anyone want your personal information, it's all lies anyway.

Can you define troll --for me? --by example? --because (sic)

In your case, posting on an internet forum for the sole purpose of attracting attention usually by posting egregiously wrong statements in order to incite a reaction. My example is my post 1764 on the previous page, a bare faced lie that you still don't have the balls to admit to.

I find that drole.

and?

But for you to picture it, I spend better part of two yearson a hot tropical island near the beach, newly mariied, with a calculator, ruler, cicle-calipers, and copies of reams of astronomical charts, copies I had made in Honolulu. some old charts that were not in Miles, not Metric format. (sic)

Really? Of course you did, or are you lying again? Because previously it was twenty years wasnt it? Good grief you are a fool.

the planetary spacings, that I worked on for twenty yearsin the most beautiful surroundings [like heisenberg if you know the de-tails] (sic)

and the number 186 000 came up more than once. I was on to something. just having charts can do wonders. google T Brahe/ J Kepler. (sic)

You know I could spend a whole week looking at famous astronomers and I would still think you are a liar.

prologos

well, my 2 year old daughter delighted me this morning with her demanding attention, for a father that is pushing 90, that is delight, (think of Benjamin)

Astronomy clubs ( ours has at least one astr. professor with whom I am interacting all the time) need comedy nights, I am not going to disappoint them with some well placed puns, baffling them with balls. and

What is observed, and is still out there are:

10 orbit spacings doubling in size, but not exeeding 9.6 AU , starting at .4, not smaller than .3 ! with

these 4 parameters have all 10 orbits defined with 5% accuracy.

Only because we observe them, it is proven not to be lies.

There is no 2 year 20 year discrepency: that 2 year honey moon/ cum bode session has stretched into a 20+ year marriage and 2 children, the last 2 years old (biographies are revealing).

and I am still learning* about spacings, thanks to you, Vivian, Caedes. Snares and Racket.

of lies -- it's not a packet.

* I expect the question and answer session to be on a higher technical level than the discussion here, and I learned from you, and I am faster at repost QUESTIONS, orally than on the keyboard.

Atheists, here is a 'balls' question ---even for all---

Share this