twitch, the planetary spacings, that I worked on for twenty years in the most beautiful surroundings [like heisenberg if you know the de-tails] I consider facts, trusting the published data. the b&T explanation or measurement was partial.
Well, feel free to cite the published data you've worked from. We've been waiting.
The corelation between solar resonances are evident, are they DIRECT causes? a hidden domain? consider
If you mean orbital resonances, yes, there is something to it with respect to ratios but please pay attetion to terms; they are important.
As regards these being direct causes (assumed to be theist/deist influenced) that depends on your belief, which is only an opinion and not science, of course.
Hidden domain? Are you some sort of wizard?
the lagrangian points 60 degrees, that is at the RADIUS distance, before and after Jupiter, the Trojan asteroids,( and other bodies) this is compatible with resonance NODES based on the orbit radius, (with its roots in the T&B idea) of course garvity is involved, but it seems to have a wave character.
Again with the waves thing, eh? You have some points that corroborate to certain facts, if in your usual cryptic style but you seem to have fascination with seeing waves where there are none.
Lagrange points and orbital resonances are based on gravity, classical mechanics, periodic relationships and ratios. Though waves are typically periodic in nature, these examples do not induce or are a result of wave propagation even if the latter is periodic. Nodes in physics are points on a standing wave and don't apply here.
If you have published peer reviewed references that say otherwise, please by all means, cite them. Otherwise, your musings are at best speculative, at worst, misleading.
