by prologos 224 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
The idea was to look at the fun part of the bigger world around us, and to restate rules in the solar planetary disc:
starting with mercury there is no orbit difference that is not a multiple of .3 AU or a fraction, or greater than 19.2 AU, the average is governed by the Bode principle, the inner spacing is half the outer spacing, all within 5% for ALL orbits.
doubling the length, the area smacks of the octave scale.
Utter non-sense and completely wrong. Please learn to read a chart.
about the max observed orbit radius difference: 9.6 AU, thank you for the correction.re:
~half-way traveller Neptune, 39.44-19.2= 20.29:2=10.146*+19.2=29.346 versus real: 30.06 ---97.62% accurate.
*10.146 versus 9.6 proposed max orbit gap: -- 5.68 % accurate.
obviously I am painting with broader strokes than is to everybodies liking but:
look at the beauty of that escalating planetary spacing 5% predictable with the extended, limited bode sequence.
all done with natural laws if you include wave functions.
Order is not rigid and inflexible. Go beyond Newtontian Physics please.
What about the uncertainty principle ?
Werner Heisenberg stated that the more precisely the position of some particle
is determined, the less precisely its momentum can be known, and vice versa.
the Heisenberg principle. This ascribes the uncertainty in the measurable
quantities to the jolt-like disturbance triggered by the act of observation.
The Born rule ?
.
Werner Heisenberg stated that the more precisely the position of some particle
is determined, the less precisely its momentum can be known, and vice versa.
Correct.
This ascribes the uncertainty in the measurable
quantities to the jolt-like disturbance triggered by the act of observation.
Incorrect. You've made the common mistake of confusing the uncertainty principle with the observer effect.
Historically, the uncertainty principle has been confused [6] [7] with a somewhat similar effect in physics, called the observer effect, which notes that measurements of certain systems cannot be made without affecting the systems. Heisenberg offered such an observer effect at the quantum level (see below) as a physical "explanation" of quantum uncertainty. [8] It has since become clear, however, that the uncertainty principle is inherent in the properties of all wave-like systems, [4] and that it arises in quantum mechanics simply due to the matter wave nature of all quantum objects. Thus, the uncertainty principle actually states a fundamental property of quantum systems, and is not a statement about the observational success of current technology
I am glad there is more certainty in the planetary disk than in the quantum world. and observing the solar bodies's distances, does not disturbs the orbits much, even if we novoday's use radar beams.
even if we novoday's use radar beams.
We don't use radar to observe other planets and solar bodies.
like in breaking bad, this thread proove science is more interesting in combination with crystal meth.
please google Radar astronomy, imaging, and laser beams, another form of electromagnetic, bundled radiation that was used to more accurately range the moon via french - made reflectors left by the astronauts.
there is nothing uncertain about the planetary spacings except the 5% and that is where the 'universal law' connection might be found.
bohm: many good minds have achieved substantial HIGH- stances on science without sub-stances like CM.
You're right about radar astronomy, prologos! I just learned something, thanks!
But, as charts and math have shown, you are 100% wrong about Bode-Titius hypothesis. Charts and math have proven that over and over.
vivian, I can not be 100% wrong when your own charts [ thank you], show Titius bode is 80% right, from Mercury to Uranus !!! and my modification makes it 1005 right by
applying a different ruler to the same UNCHANGING DATA. and
the augmented rules are: minimum orbital difference is .3 AU a 3 in the bode scheme.and
9.6 AU maximum difference in orbit diameter. so:
while Pluto fits the the doubling outer orbit reach of Bode, the 9.6 AU rule requires another planet above Uranus.
taking this geometric progression BELOW Venus, we should have an infinite number of planets below that bright retrograde glower, but there is none at 1.5 AU below venus or .75 AU below that because of the apparent .3 AU MINIMUM rule
where do these 9.6 max -- .3 AU OBSERVATIONS come from? ---my guess? resonances ! 5 doubling in gaps? octaves.? our grand has 7 octaves, not achieved by length alone like organ pipes. ?
!AU=99 light seconds .3 AU= 149.5 light seconds 1/2 of the solar 5 minutes pulsation, the small orbit diameter difference.
Balls in solar array. spaced out in doubling distances. conforming all the laws
these balls.
