The author of the linked article, like this Hildabingen WATCHTOWER TROLL, is a lying, fucking idiot. He knowingly uses absolutely classic false arguments. Of course, this will work on braindead rank & file JWs, but not on anyone with a brain functioning above the level of a gnat.
For example, the author's main argument is this: "... many think that this story is indigenous to JW's alone." In classic JW fashion the author fails to state who these "many" are, but just leaves it up to the reader to accept his false claim as truth, and as representative of the claims of critics of Jehovah's Witnesses generally. The fact is that anyone who thinks what the author claims is himself an idiot, because the issue of pedophilia has received plenty of media coverage. Because of this coverage, anyone with brainpower greater than a gnat's understands that pedophilia is an ill of society at large. The author is far from stupid in an intellectual sense, and one can see this by his ability to find and collate stories about pedophilia, but his moral failure is plainly evident in his deliberate misrepresentation of the community of critics of Jehovah's Witnesses. By his implication that all critics claim that only JWs have the pedophilia problem, he has misrepresented the issues that critics are really focusing on. In other words, the author's entire argument is a great big straw man.
Why do I talk about the author's implication about critics? Because he only deals with the tiny number of unspecified critics who might possibly be stupid enough to think that only JWs have a problem with pedophilia, and fails to deal with the facts presented by the great majority of critics who are perfectly well aware that every segment of society, religious or otherwise, suffers from this problem.
Moral idiots like our linked author try to convince others that critics of JWs are unaware of the evil that also exists in other religions. That is simply not so. Critics of JWs focus on JWs for a simple reason: they know JWs better than they know any other religion. They leave criticism of other religions to those who know them best. But because they have precious few good arguments against the charges brought by JW critics, JW apologists like our idiot author often invent strawmen that are easy to knock down.
This deliberate invention of straw men illustrates another major fault of Jehovah's Witnesses (and of course, related religions that like to cover over their embarassing stupidities): they have little respect for the truth. Rather, their focus is on keeping their organization's name free from blemish in the eyes of the public. They subscribe to the refrain: "my religion right or wrong". They have forgotten that they claim to worship the God of Truth.
This disrespect for truth is well illustrated by the lies that Watchtower spokesman J. R. Brown has been telling the media during the past couple of weeks. Those who have kept up with this board know very well what lies Brown has told, such as that "headquarters" knew nothing of who would appear on the upcoming NBC Dateline program until last Tuesday, and that the recent charges of "sin" on the part of four people who will appear on the program were brought only by elders acting on a local level. Brown implied that Watchtower headquarters is not coordinating the disfellowshipping efforts. Brown has committed a disfellowshipping offense by lying to the public. Will Watchtower bring charges of lying against him? Of course not, because as their prime spokesman, it is evident that he was instructed to lie by his superiors. Will JW apologists acknowledge that Brown lied? Of course not, because to do so would burst their bubble.
It is certain that many more JW apologists will appear on this board, and that many more apologists will write deceptive pieces in an attempt to prop up the moral failures of "God's organization."
AlanF