Physics: What are your thoughts on life in the 4th,5th,and higher dimensions?

by EndofMysteries 81 Replies latest jw friends

• 

  Viviane

  In all this bluster, there is not a word of substance to show specifically where oints made , illustrations used are INCORRECT.

  Your errors have been pointed out many times by many posters. You not being willing to recognize that does it make less true.

  seriously though, I delight to express known and verified scientitic concepts in unconventional ways, to jerk complacent readers into attention, into taking a second look. If you can read in on google, it is already stale, old hat.

  You are not providing unconventional insights into concepts, you are mixing up concepts and mistaking your ideas for fact and pushing incorrect information. You really really really need to use Google to educate yourself. Not doing so an proclaiming yourself as an educator providing insight for the complacent is hubris and error of the highest order combined with ignorance and laziness.

  still working on jgnat's illustration of the flatlanders understanding that time is at 90degrees to them, and outside their dimensions, by timing the change in size of the circle secant of the ball moving upward.

  Pure nonsense.
• 

  snare&racket

  Some people would rwther spend their time arguing than educating themselves.

  ask yourself why?

  these people dont want to learn..... And that is why it is best to leave them to it,
• 

  no lies please

  Great subject. It seems that quantum physics supports the idea of other dimensions scientifically. But determining what exists in those dimensions or whether humans could access them seems entirely uncertain. Some scientists suggest that only our consciousness, not our bodies could do so. Physicist and NASA consultant Tom Campbell gives lectures suggesting that it's not only possible, but has been done.
• 

  prologos

  if it could happen, or has been done could be illustrated by the ball penetrating the -'2 dimension plus time'- flatland introduced by jgnat.

  a flatland astronomer, A. Fleming was watchig that circle penetrating, but noticed that light from flatstars behind it could still be seen, and even after the circle vanished, there was this delay in the light arriving, so they concluded that flatland was warped, tensioned, not simply flat at all, and then there were the ripples coming from the farthest regions seen in all directions, did they come from causes outside their disk too, like the intruding circle? so

  flatlanders decided to pay attention to ripples, vibes, not jibes.
• 

  Viviane

  if it could happen, or has been done could be illustrated by the ball penetrating the -'2 dimension plus time'- flatland introduced by jgnat.

  Nonesense and woo.
• 

  prologos

  the 2 dimension model implies that the higher dimensions are external, larger.

  the 5-11 dimension hypothesis ideas have included, SMALLER further dimension, curled up.

  life hiding in the folds? fantasies
• 

  Viviane

  the 2 dimension model implies that the higher dimensions are external, larger.

  the 5-11 dimension hypothesis ideas have included, SMALLER further dimension, curled up.

  life hiding in the folds? fantasies

  Tell me, why does it imply that? Can you give any reason from your own understanding? Do all ideas involving physics and dimensions have these same ideas? What does "curled up" mean? Like a cat in your lap? Smaller than what?
• 

  prologos

  as seen in the diagrams posted by jgnat, the 2 dimensional plane can be penetrated by that bigger 3D globe. and

  on both side of the stretched diaphragm is half a universe, whereas the surface has NO THICKNESS at all, can not hold an object of ANY VOLUME. by it's nature the 2 dimension sheet alone is infinitely smaller than any 3 dimensional object.

  I use the word streched membrane, because as flatland Prof A Eddington ( fleming) saw, the membrane is streched, deformed by gravity, and as we know now, deformed in ripples of gravity waves.

  Material I have read, not researched, taught, that these higher dimensions [if any] are curled up in the strings, folds of the ultra small. I am just passing this on, I can not imagine it either, for they are NOT MY fantasies, whereas

  I believe to have a good grasp of the model of the expanding 2 dimensional balloon membrane, and its features,

  If it is WOO,--- WHY WOULD jgnat post it?
• 

  Viviane

  I asked you if you even understood what you were posting, not why jgnat would post it.

  The reason I did that was because I suspected you would prevaricate and show that you don't in the least understand what you are talking about. You do that a lot and get basic fundamentals wrong because, as you just showed, YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.

  You are just attempting to parrotting ideas you hear about without any ability to understand them or discern woo from real.
• 

  prologos

  well, thank you for the attention, but prologos' lack of understanding is not the topic, higher dimensions are, and if you understand them, we are privilegded to have such a rare individual on this forum. please teach us the facts then and waste your and our time on personal analisis. and,

  well, I was wrong. if you have a 2dimensional plane, only if it would be of maximum size in diameter would half the universe be above and below it. but,

  since the plane is really skinny, zero thickness, since there obviously is volume to the universe, we know that in our realm higher dimension mean bigger, more extensive no matter how you slice it --[the universe]

  GET IT?