The recruiting efforts building up to 1975 actually gathered them up enough people and money for their goals. They paid for modernization of the printing company and the number of people who left was smaller than the number recruited.
They are operating on similar assumptions now and I think they are wrong. They think they will retain more than they lose by lightening the load of elders and members as far as meetings go but cracking the whip on all members to "obey."
In the book, THE TIPPING POINT, the author, Gladwell defines a tipping point as "the moment of critical mass, the threshold, the boiling point". The book seeks to explain and describe the "mysterious" sociological changes that mark everyday life. As Gladwell states, "Ideas and products and messages and behaviors spread like viruses do". The examples of such changes in his book include the rise in popularity and sales of Hush Puppies shoes in the mid-1990s and the steep drop in the New York City crime rate after 1990. It has nothing to do with JW's, but it is possible to reach that critical mass or boiling point with the members.
For me, it should have been making "this generation" unattached from people alive in 1914. To me, it seems that it should have been further changes in major doctrines about "this generation," or the FDS, or laying off Bethelites, or the UN membership, or now- seizing congregation moneys. But if I didn't wake up for a decade past the generation change, others may take time to wake up (or never do it) as far as the latest changes come and go. The members did not walk out in masses when the 20th century passed. I doubt the 100 year anniversary of Christ's presence will do it either.
I hope I am wrong. But I see smaller numbers waking up at each point. I see younger ones leaving at adulthood or getting DF'ed and never going back. I see the organization peaking somewhere around where it is now. (I think it peaked after 7 million and the numbers are slightly bogus now.) But the shrinking of the organization would go past my lifetime, maybe another 100 years.
Still, that one lawsuit or one GB member being caught with his hand down a boy's pants. That one big negative story about too many children dying over doctrinal issues. It could reach critical mass. I don't care for six screens or AAWA or protesting at Conventions/Memorials. I see these things as the prophesized persecution they tell members about. But who knows? Maybe something will stick. If anything, I think it would be the pedophile issues.