by Tallyman 30 Replies latest jw friends
*
No, those are not the terrorists.
They are the people FLEEING the Terrorist.
Here are the Terrorist Strikes against famous NYC landmarks:
* http://www.intrex.net/talley/Weep_34.html
We wonder why the Terroristic Watchtowerkult Propaganda
has NEVER shown the Brooklyn Bridge or the Statue of Liberty
being blown up and going down in flames?
...ummm, maybe, just a leetle too klose fer komfert??
LOve, Tallyman
Thank You Tallyman
It is true that we lived for the 'Great Terrorist's Promise.' Your web site is a reminder of the sickness of the indoctrinated JW mind and those who are most responsible, the people who live at the end of the Brooklyn Bridge.
Those pictures of Armageddon always bothered me - especially as a child. I had nightmares about that!!
And I couldn't figure out why those people left behind would be smiling - wouldn't they be sad about the loss of life? I still feel that way today - I would be sad that anyone had to die.
Tallyman - when I first read the thread - or rather the title to the thread last night - my heart came up into my throat. (and I'm Canadian, not American) Given that there are terrorist alerts goin around - IMHO, the title to the thread could've been worded more sensitively.
Just a thought hon,
Mimilly
Tally,
You're right of course! But Mimilly has a point, don't you think?
BTW I readily agree that the reality of the WTS prophecies is akin to the dreadful terrorist acts.
Cheers,
Ozzie
I am curious Tally.
As part of your Christian faith, what do you think will happen to Wall Street and the United Nations bldg etc. when your lord Jesus Christ returns?
Joel
When your lord Jesus Christ returns...
Good choice of words!
"Vaccination has never saved a human life. It does not prevent smallpox." The Golden Age, Feb 4 1931 p. 293-4 - The Sacredness of Human Blood (Reasons why vaccination is unscriptural)
IMHO, the title to the thread could've been worded more sensitively.
Just a thought hon,
Hi Mimilly!
Nice to make your acquaintance, because I don't think we've ever
exhanged pleasantries before.
Okay, I'm openminded and certainly open to suggestions.
I titled the thread:
"Terrorists Strike NYC landmarks!!!!!!!!!!!!"
because I went for the 'attention-grabbing' approach like so many here do... and because, even though the title of the thread may be
a tad sensational, I felt once a person OPENED the thread and read
the CONTENTS, they would see that the title accurately conveyed
those contents.
But, since you had a thought on the matter, shuge, and since you
expressed it here, I would really like to know how you would
have titled the thread - of course, AFTER you read the contents
and knew what the thread was all about - and since you put an emphasis
on "sensitivity"... HOW would you have titled my thread "more sensitively"?
I anxiously await your suggestion for a more sensitive title.
LOve, Tallyman
Tally,
You're right of course! But Mimilly has a point, don't you think?
Hi Oz!
Please see my post I just put up for Mimilly.
In the meantime, if you get a chance to read this before Mimilly does
and before she has an opportunity to 'reword my thread title'
"more sensitively", as a suggestion...
and since you indicate that she has a point...
how would you Ozzie, have worded the title of the thread?
I anxiously await YOUR suggestion for a more sensitive title.
Hey, I'm open.
LOve, Tallyman
There is NOTHING sensitive or nurturing re: the WTBTS.
Nothing.
Their policies MURDER CHILDREN.
You can try to place strategic 'sugar cubes' to cushion the 'blow'. Yet sugar cubes dissolve and the real taste comes thru.
BOTULISM and POISON are hidden.
But Tom!!
The art department has depicted accurately, with "NO MISTAKES", what will ACCURATELY occur...in due time. (< http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/forum/thread.asp?id=28222&page=2&site=3 )
Rejoice!
sKally ("it's not about answering the questions...it's about questioning the answers") klass
Too many 'lambs'!
