Hey first let me thank all of you for replying, especially those who obviously put a good deal of thought into a lengthy reply.
I can see that for many the emphasis is on the EX part of ex-JW. Of course, fundamentally I only want to point out that definition is dependent upon the JW. After all, if you just say ex- it doesn't mean anything. But another way to look at it is that label is relative, you have to refer back to something else for it to have any meaning, and that also means it is not absolute. It has no inherent meaning, though being a JW doesn't have inherent meaning either, really.
I'm just gonna throw this one thought out there, it just came to me while reading the replies, particularly Truman and Lady Lee's I guess. How do I say this.. Life itself is not defined, it's simply lived. We tend to take the view of our individual life, which usually means what we've done from the time we were born up until now. I would just call that thing's you've done, but not exactly your life. Granted this is using the word in a different sense, but I think it's helpful to point out that life is still out there, and in fact, in that sense it's more like you haven't really lived during the time you were a dub right? In fact, I can see how dub think might see a phrase like "living it up" in a negative light, that it would involve some kind of loose conduct or something. But what's wrong with that statement? It's not actually wrong to live is it? Anyway, I'm sure most of you live a fuller life now, and I guess that's what I was trying to point to. The question was kind of a trick question in a way, how you see life (or yourself, or whatever) isn't as important as living it.