lastcall, good post. I should probably leave it at that, but I think an answer needs to be provided for the future JW apologists who will undoubtedly resort to the same reasonings as above.
Unanswered questions to amac:
If you think this is not representative of a meeting with elders under these circumstances, perhaps you could share exactly what you think does happen in a typical meeting. At what point does crawdad's story become atypical? The personal questions? The conclusion that there is nothing they can (will) do? The warning not to tell anyone else for fear of shunning? I'm curious.I asked you a series of brief, easy questions, which you declined to answer, preferring instead, to set up a straw-man. It is the hallmark of a weak argument.
You are right, I'm sure most elder bodies, when approached with a suspected child molestation, will take the supposed victim alone into a room, so they can ask question after question to satisfy their own sexual curiosity,Neither crawdad nor I said anything about asking these questions for the elders' sexual gratification. Did you need to take it to that extreme to win your argument? If so, then you might ask why that is. If these untrained men (never a woman to do the questioning, to help ease the little girl's anxiety) were asking those questions in a mechanical, yet insensitive way, might not the effect on the little girl be the same?
with absolutely no feelings for the child but only thinking how to get rid of the situation.Well now you're at least on the right track. This is the point that I got from crawdad, and it mirrors so very many experiences I've read and heard personally. The pathetic thing is, many judicial bodies really think they have the person's best interest in mind, but they must first consider Mother. What results is a mechanical cold-hearedness that further victimizes the abused. Is it intentional? Surely not. But it is so often what you get when you have a group of untrained elders handling these cases in a pharisaical, legalistic manner, with the organization's reputation foremost in mind.
Lady Lee started an excellent thread about believing your own myths, and cognitive dissonance.
The question her to the point of crying (because that's their favorite part!)Again with the logical fallacies. Crawdad didn't say because that's their favorite part! You added that to make a more easily defeated argument. Surely you don't have a problem with the statement that she would be questioned to the point of crying? In my old hall they used to call it "the crying room." So what do you disagree with? Oh yeah, you disagree with the statement that you inserted. The words that you put in someone's mouth are suddenly "delusional". Nice debating technique. [insert sarcastic eye-rolling thingie here]
and then leave her hanging for 5 minutes just to tell her "Sorry, no witnesses." And they conclude withI understand that you're not good at answering direct questions (JR Brown better watch his back) but maybe you could enlighten me as to what part of these statements you find so hard to believe:
You don't think they step out of the room? You think they hash it out in front of the person?
You doubt it takes five whole minutes? How many minutes... four... three?
I don't mean to confuse you with multiple questions, just pick one of them. That would be super.
Oh yeah, if you tell anyone else this, you will DIE!What's so funny is you thought that by exaggerating, you could make some extreme statement that wasn't believable. Well go watch Dateline, and tell that to Erica and all the others who are threatened by spiritual death, followed "any day now"" by literal death for causing divisions, speaking out against a brother, or whatever the excuse du jour is.
That is the picture you seem to attempt to portray in the initial post, albeit through semantic implications.It seemed to me--and I could be wrong here--that he was relaying a real-life experience that happened to someone he knew. If that's the case, it is not meant to portray EVERY SINGLE MEETING, WITH EVERY SINGLE GROUP OF ELDERS IN THE WORLD. By taking it to such a silly extreme it's easy to tell yourself that it doesn't happen at all. Congratulations.
Crawdad was doing what all good journalists do... making the story personal. Figures are boring and dont mean anything. A personal story is what will reach people. And if that was a true story, and you decided to utilize a few sad debating tricks to put a notch on your argument belt, I just hope you never find yourself in a position to have to tell a story like that to people.
Get real. If that is the way you feel the majority of elder bodies act, then you are more brainwashed than a die hard JW.Now I'm more curious than ever. Maybe you could describe your picture of a typical JW elder's meeting. Warning, if it involves such pathetic phrases as "spirit-directed" or "prayerfully considered" you wont find many buyers for your snakeoil here.
Hmmm