Many more pedaphiles in the churches with reason

by Bleep 49 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • Bang
    Bang

    quotes

    since they (JWs) are no different from any other group/religion.

    I strongly resent the implication that jws are no different from any other group/religion. In my examination of jwism it has become clear to me that as a group they are considerably more arrogant when confronted by plain truth than most peoples are. Aditionally, they very much stand out for delivering a prolifery of dead works, providing meaningless words to the hungry and sick. If I am confronted by someone who is a practising jw, I naturally consider that the person I am dealing with is deluded and spiritually sick if not dead (perhaps suffering from a mood disorder) and that it is likely they will lie to me and my family, and care less or perhaps be downright nasty while all the while pretending to be 'nice'. I thank God that do not expect this from other groups or the population at large.

    Bang

  • SYN
    SYN

    Bang: Sounds like Theocratic Warfare to me!

  • Bleep
    Bleep

    If you have concerns that the Watchtower and Awake society are hiding something then dont go here but ask the society. I am sure not too many Ex JWs here did that.

  • Bleep
    Bleep

    Once again the Ex JWs are trying to change the subject and direct the attentian to this one Religion that keeps growing. Later I will tell the reasons why it is growing.

    My topic was directed to the pedophiles that could not marry. If you did not want to talk about that subject then do not rebuke me. I rest my case.

  • larc
    larc

    Bleep, your simple minded answers just amaze me. Ask the leaders, are you kidding? This was done on the Dateline and the UK program. What did they give? On the Dateline program they provided a video with noninformation, and would not subject themselves to an interview. On the UK program, what did they give? Criptic nonanswers is what they gave.

  • NameWithheld
    NameWithheld

    Ha ha. Ask the society. Seems a few did ... like Mr Bowen, and the answer? "Leave it to Jehovah". Seems Panorama asked the 'society' too (AKA Ted Jacraz "The Boss"). More silence. Been there, done that!

    "one Religion that keeps growing"?!?!?!?!?! Now YOU are steeped in your own propoganda. JWs are not growing very much anymore, and certainly not faster than many other religions - say the Mormons perhaps? They have 11+ million. Where are YOU at? Oh, just a piddly little 6 million? Awww poor baby!

    "I rest my case" - remind me never to use you as my lawyer!

  • ChristianObserver
    ChristianObserver

    Hello Bleep :o)

    I'll comment on your point here if I may:

    >There are many many more pedophiles in the churches. Before making accusations that Jehovahs people are the religion of child abusers look at the other churches.

    1. The priests that they have can not marry. Makes me think about other vows the nuns make. They have alot more reasons to child sexual abuse than my religion.>

    I have, unfortunately, and for differing reasons, come into personal contact with 4 paedophiles. The first was a 17 year old boy who molested his sister and 2 of her female friends. The second was a man in his 30's, married with 2 children. The third was another male in his 30's, married with 2 children whose preference was for little boys :'o( The fourth was a male in his 50's, married with 2 children.

    I also taught 2 sisters who could not go to main stream school due to emotional problems following long term sexual abuse by their step-father and his brother. The younger of the sisters was pregnant by her step-father - she was but 15 years old. Both abusers were married men with children.

    So 5 males - all married with children. My personal experience does not bear out your own findings, Bleep.

    I have been told by a Jehovah's Witness that the Roman Catholic Church considers and teaches that it is preferable *for a priest to engage in a sexual relationship with a child, than to marry in order to have a *natural* outlet for their sexual needs*!!!!

    A statement like that could be made only by someone who

    a has absolutely no knowledge of the nature of paedophilia, or

    b has been taught that view by someone with no knowledge themselves, or

    c they or the person who has *taught* them this view, wishes to find fault with the Roman Catholic Church, or

    d has no understanding of the nature of a vow of celibacy.

    Now those within the Roman Catholic Church who have abused children, have broken their vow of celibacy in a most atrocious way. There has been a tremendous scandal about the abuse situation in the Roman Catholic Church and I read that 20 priests implicated in cases have now committed suicide. The Church is now attempting to address the problem that has been exposed, and it is not a moment too soon.

    A vow of celibacy does not solely mean that the person remains unmarried. It is a vow which requires abstension from sexual relations with another person.

    I wonder, Bleep, if you can supply any facts or figures to support your contention that *There are many many more pedophiles in the churches.*?

    Can you supply a reference for these figures which you have for the Churches which have lead you to make such a statement?

    From what figures for Jehovah's Witnesses were you drawing a comparison? Does this statement, *Looking at the database of Jehovahs witnesses (which could be anyone newly baptized) I saw 20,000 cases with three largest countries combined including United States of America* mean that you have had sight of the WTBTS database and that you are confirming a figure of 20,000 paedophiles within three countries within the organisation as recorded therein?

    Apart from the US, what are the other 2 countries included in the 3 countries to which you refer?

    You know, there are a lot of people who are seeking to PROTECT children within the organisation. It is not these people who are bringing *reproach* on Jehovah as Scully has already mentioned. Why would they be bringing *reproach* on Jehovah by trying to protect His children?

    Who in your opinion is bringing the most *reproach* on Jehovah:

    1 the person who claims to be a Jehovah's Witness, but who sexually abuses a child? or

    2 the person who tries to change the policies of the *Watchtower Bible and Tract Society* such that all allegations of sexual abuse are referred to the police so that victims can receive the correct counsel, care and support and the perpetrators of these dreadful crimes can be dealt with appropriately?

    And the paedophile priests from the Roman Catholic Church have brought reproach on whom would you say? God, or the Roman Catholic Church?

    The paedophile Jehovah's Witnesses in positions of service have brought reproach on whom would you say? Jehovah, or the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society?

    Cheers!

    Edited by - ChristianObserver on 18 July 2002 12:43:10

  • SYN
    SYN

    Bleep, you are strongly beginning to resemble that famous metaphor, the proverbial brick wall.

    Do you deny the fact that there are 20,000+ paedos in the Society?

    Do you deny the fact that Elders are told to "wait on Jehovah" when they have less than 2 Witnesses (capitilization absolutely intended)?

    Do you deny the fact that the mother of those woman on Panorama was told to "pray harder and be a better wife" over a dozen times?

    Do you deny the fact that paedos are allowed to go out in Field Service?

    Come on big guy, the world is watching. Don't change the subject, we've all seen it many times.

  • Bleep
    Bleep

    Im not the brick wall in this case. The subject is about the other churches haveing more of a reason or motive to child molest. Surely if I am going to pay my taxes for the police and detectives just shows that we need the services that are set up for all orginizations including religions.

    Those services are needed to take out those bishops. Nice try guys trying to change the topic.

  • Crazy151drinker
    Crazy151drinker

    . The subject is about the other churches haveing more of a reason or motive to child molest.

    Bleep, you cant possilbly be this stupid! Do you even care that they are 23,000+ active molesters in your 'organization'? The 'other churches' do not have in anyway more motive to molest children. Your assumption is sickining. Your supporting argument for WT actions is "They have more motive so we are better?" There is NEVER any reason to molest Children. YOU are a sick FUCK.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit