Gypsywildone:
It
is all a matter of perspective. Some people seem to me to believe that virtually any prophecy actually pronounced against ancient Israel has a 'greater fulfillment'. This is obviously a matter of faith, as 'greater fulfillment' exergesis is not specified in the New Testament as a modus operandum for Christians. Any 'greater fulfillment' of a prophecy is specifically given within the New Testament itself. Going 'beyond the things that are written' by interpreting ancient prophetic statements as having a 'greater' modern fulfillment is a matter for personal belief alone, but it carries no authority from the Scriptures. Jewish rabbis and early Church 'Fathers' (notably Origen) were known to search the scriptures for some greater meaning (even 'hidden' knowledge). There is a danger in doing this for it can lead to antagonistic religious debate, animosity, self-righteousness, and even in some cases people appointing themselves as God's mouthpiece. Note please what Peter revealed about certain ones in his day:
"Furthermore, consider the patience of our Lord as salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul according to the wisdom given him also wrote you, speaking about these things as he does also in all [his] letters. In them, however, are some things hard to understand, which the untaught and unsteady are twisting, as [they do] also
the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction." - 2 Peter 3:15 & 16 (
New World Translation)
It is one thing to say that 'I
believe the prophecies refer to...', but quite another to say 'The prophecies [
by implication: definitely] refer to...' as if God had personally spoken to us and told us so. However, I can see nothing wrong in considering God's dealings with Israel and how its spiritual shepherds treated those under their care as
examples or patterns for our instruction (compare 1 Corinthians 10:1-11).
Note please, this scripture:
"Then I heard another voice from heaven saying, 'Come out of her,
my people [
Greek = 'ho laos mou' = 'the people of me'], so that you do not take part in her sins, and so that you do not share in her plagues, for her sins are heaped high as heaven and God has remembered her iniquities." - Revelation 18:4 (
NRSV)
Here the scriptures themselves actually use the example of the Israelites in bondage to literal Babylon, and shows that like them, God's people - yes, 'my people', indicating that they were
already recognised by him as his own while in bondage - had to
remove themselves from that entity which was holding them prisoner, in order to escape the plagues coming upon it. It was a case of loyalty to God, not a man-made entity that was important, and one had the opportunity to show integrity to God by 'voting with one's feet', as the expression goes. This of course does not mean that God's people would be committing apostasy by leaving 'Babylon the Great', for they would retain their faith and relationship with God as one of his people under the direction of His spirit.
It is my belief that the mark of a spiritual 'man' is his standing for truth and integrity to God even when this requires of him to expose his religious teachers and remove himself from their company.