*will someone please help SpiceItUp get a grip*?
For one, Spice, if you think I "attacked" you only because I said that I thought you didn't understand the true meaning of two words, well, then to me that means that you have never really been attacked IN LIFE. Ever. Make no mistake: I *could have* attacked you (as you were/are very open to it) but I left that up to 4skins. I only attacked your ARGUMENT. Big difference.
Secondly, I gather (if that pic you posted on the other thread is a recent pic of you) that you are young. If so, your youth speaks volumes.
------------
I could (maybe should) let your tortured post slide on by but that would be what the Jehovahs call a mistaken kindness. (hey, they are right about *some* things.) I would be remiss in not trying to help a sistah out if I didn't show you something you need to know about the Internet and, by extension, life itself.
That is: you (I, we) are free to express yourself (ourselves) but sometimes people will disagree with you (us). When that happens, it doesn't mean you or they are right or wrong. It only means that you disagree. So far... no biggee.
At this point, what often happens (both here and in life) is that those with the weaker argument (or skill) lose their grip. Rather than reconnoiter, instead of stepping back and reconsidering new or different viewpoints, they get personal. If the shoe fits...
Your saying here that, I "have come off as a big-time chavenistic pic" is only the latest example of what I'm talking about. What exactly did I say that makes me come off as a chauvinist? Was it when I said that men don't like masculine women? Or, maybe it was when I said that men don't like loud-mouth, overly assertive women. I'm confused. Could'ya help a bruvva out? If I said something out of line I will apologize, right as rain.
>> And if you looked closer I said a picture OR something.
No need for me to "look closer." I know you said, "I said a picture OR something." What you don't seem to understand is that in this format there is nothing I could offer you that would PROVE my masculinity. It's really that simple. By the same token, there is nothing you or any other woman could post that could prove *their* femininity. Why is that so hard for you to understand?
You said: "... you decided to take the low road yet again and attacked me." Care to stand by your words and show us where I "attacked" you? And "yet again"? In other words, I've attacked you before? When?
You said: "I was only asking you to prove what you declared and that was that you are masculine. But apparently you cant prove that with words either."
Bingo!!! Now we're getting somewhere. If you think a man can "PROVE" to you "WITH WORDS" that he is masculine, you only demonstrate that, as I said earlier you don't know the meaning of the words. Not only that, you may be in line for a bit of a let-down in areas of life that are waaay more meaningful to you than winning a silly argument on an online discussion forum.
Look, I could go on but what would be the point? As I said at the outset, there are things about online posting that you need to understand. Maybe one day you will. I'm not trying to give you a hard time. My goal is to help you.