Dearest Gumby... may you have peace...
You said: "Shelby, your beliefs in Jesus have come from the Bible. Were it not for the Bible......you would have never known such a man existed....unless he revealed it to you in some way such as a vision or a dream."
Please know that the latter is true, dear Gumby, that my beliefs in my Lord, whose name is NOT "Jesus" (the English rendering for the phrase "Je is Zeus" (Ieosus) or "Jah is God" - look up the Greek word "Zeus"), but JAHESHUA (JAH Saves) MISCHAJAH (Chosen/Anointed of JAH). It was he himself that revealed himself to me, personally, when I apparently asked God (known to me as "Jehovah" at the time) to do so. The Bible, actually, had left me confused... due to the many misrenderings, mistranslations... and misleadings of earthling man. It was not until I began to hear the voice of my Lord... and listen to THAT voice as it explained to me what was 'written'... that I began to know what was inspired... and what was not. Thus, some of what Paul taught... and wrote... was not. However, in his humility, Paul CONSTANTLY corrected himself. A review of his early writings compared with his later ones show this.
My question is.....how is it you have seperated the Bible in that you do not believe Paul was an instrument of Jesus.......but you believe in Jesus?
See above, and know that I don't simply 'believe' in my Lord, but KNOW him... and by knowing HIM know the FATHER... and am known BY him... as well as by the Father... for he himself 'chose' me for such knowledge. ; And it is he who has revealed the man, my brother, Paul... and his heart... to me. ; I have never seen or heard Paul, but I have most seen and heard ;my Lord.
Let me ask you: does an anointing with holy spirit render one never 'wrong'? If so, how is that Paul recanted his admonition to remove the wicked man? How is that certain ones, who had received the same spirit as Paul, were preaching circumcision? How is that Peter conducted himself in hypocrisy, so that he was corrected by Paul? You misunderstand the spirit, dear one: while it indeed is perfect, WE... are not... so that when we walk OUTSIDE that spirit... and thus, outside of LOVE, as Paul, the others and Peter did, albeit briefly, we CAN conduct ourselves in error. We CAN speak our own will... rather than that of the One who bestowed such spirit upon us.
Are the Gospels all that you believe in? What do you base this belief on if so?
Since my salvation does not lay in believing what is written but rather lays in KNOWING God and Christ, it matters not to me what is written. Indeed, I can 'search the scriptures', but I will not find everlasting life in them. So they are not as important to ME... as they might be to YOU.
As far as the writings go, however, I do know that the scriptures were inspired; that it, they were written when the writers were 'in the spirit'. However, the Gospels were NOT inspired, and thus are NOT scripture. Sorry, but that is true. The scriptures, dear one, are "Moses, the Prophets, Psalms" and the Revelation. If you would read Luke's entry to his accounts, you will see that he neither wrote BY inspiration or at the direction of the spirit, nor did he receive his information FROM the spirit. Rather, he wrote them after interviewing others who told him what they saw... and did this at the behest of Theophilus, a Roman ruler of Greek descent who wanted to discern what was occurring between the Jews and the Christians so as to know 'if these things were true'. I have not lied to you... but only told you what my Lord told ME... so that when I read it, I saw it was indeed true. Perhaps you will, too.
Also remember what Jesus himself said about a brother who dosen't listen to you, or two, or the congregation. He said "let him be as a Man of the nations" I would say he is telling you to pass judgement on a man as unworthy to ..."be around"
And yet, my Lord ALSO said, "STOP judging that you are not judged," yes? And so it is YOUR heart that wishes to judge, so that you see judgment in the words you quote. But truly, how are we to 'treat' a man of the nations, according to my Lord? How did he 'treat' the Phonecian woman, a 'man of the nations' who came to him? The Samaritan woman? The Army officer? His servant? The unclean? The sinful? Other than to refrain from throwing 'pearls' to those who don't WANT them, are we not to treat them as we would any other man, including our brother? Are we not to PROVE ourselves sons of our Father... by being 'perfect' in this... LOVING them?
Matthew 5:43-46
I don't KNOW the "Jesus" you claim to know, Gumby... for my Lord would not shut the door of his tender compassions upon any man. He did not gain disciples by shunning them; he GAINED them... by his love: by feeding, healing, teaching... and telling ALL to "come" to him. By FORGIVING them! And he received all that came... and rejected NONE, save the hypocritical Pharisees that bound heavy loads upon men that they themselves could not carry. Those he rejected because (1) they rejected HIM, and (2) they had judged themselves.
My Lord has given me something for you to read: He has directed me to direct YOU... to John 8:1-11, and asks me to ask YOU... "which one of YOU... is withOUT sin?" Who, then, can YOU judge, condemn... and stone... or even turn your back on... due to their sin? Are not YOU to do to men "as you would have them do to YOU"? How, then, can you ask for... and expect to RECEIVE... forgiveness... if you yourself do not FORGIVE?
Go RELEASING... Gumby... as did my Lord... FORGIVING people their sins and errors... whether they ASKED for it... or not! (But certainly if they do!)
Again, I bid you peace!
YOUR servant... and a slave of CHRIST,
SJ