Scriptural rebuttal to disfellowshiping

by JG 33 Replies latest jw friends

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped

    JosephMalik said:

    There is no such thing as A Holy Spirit that judges. In fact the scriptures even exclude the Father. But to phrase it as God? AND Christ AND the Holy Spirit makes 5 not three. The doctrine is a mess. Change it to Father and we have:

    John 5:22 For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son:

    However while humans like the apostle Paul cannot determine someones salvation as in the context of the above text they can judge others on matters of faith and have done so notice:

    1 Corinthians 5:3 For I verily, as absent in body, but present in spirit, have judged already, as though I were present, concerning him that hath so done this deed,

    Paul could do this because he received corrospondence from them and could make such decisions. And when the Corinthians over reacted to his remarks he had to write them to correct them once again. So he was not always understood, but that does not make him wrong. And we also have:

    1 Corinthians 7:40 But she is happier if she so abide, after my judgment: and I think also that I have the Spirit of God.

    Joseph

    You are very correct, it is the SON (Jesus Christ/Yeshua Messiah) ONLY who judges people's hearts.

    I used the wrong word above. I meant to say that that only God (the Father), Christ, and the Holy Spirit (I'm still not convinced whether or not the Spirit is a Person in Heaven or not), can READ a person's heart and know what is in a person's heart, I should not have said "judge" above.

  • minimus
    minimus

    mt.7:1,2... Lk 6: 37, Rm. 14:3, James 4:12 to name a few. Since we can't judge hearts, we have no business judging motives!

    ;

  • Sentinel
    Sentinel

    I had a good post reply, and when I entered it, it came back as "page cannot be displayed".

    Bummer.

    Bottom line. We do not live by laws or codes devised to control and manipulate people from centuries ago. Granted, one can always take the good and go with it. The Great teachers speak only of love. The Golden Rule is good enough for me.

    JW's are just another religion with their own established rules. The problem is they have become so dogmatic and judgmental, that now people are really looking at them in a whole new light. They are being judged by the laws of the land because they have been so pompus to believe they are "untouchable".

    They have no power over any of us, unless we allow them. That seems to be the problem. In disfellowshipping, one expects to be shunned. One has never been able to just "walk away". They believe that if you walk away, you are turning to evil. They have been a secretive, clannish society, and now they are out in the open more than ever. They are being scrutinized by by the world they condem, and they don't like it. They have placed themselves in the position of judge, and now things are being reversed on them, and they don't like it one little bit.

    Serves them right. Shoes on the other foot now. I feel so sad and sorry for anyone still caught up in their system. We do have to have a great deal of empathy and sympathy. However, everyone is still accountable for their own decisions. We can only do so much. I believe they will spiral out of control in self-destruction, and turn inward and become like a dying star, a black hole. Then, perhaps they will imerge out the other side as something brighter and more loving. Let us hope so.

    There are many, many sincere, wonderful, loving, good people who are baptised as JW's. Most of us used to be one of "them".

    Love and LIght,

    Sentinel/Karen

  • JT
    JT

    Quoting a page of scriptures does not do it. Each verse must be identified and explained in detail. But saying that Paul writings are the problem here or that his words should not be recognized as valid brings dishonor to our Lord who chose him specifically and miraculously to represent the faith as one of the 12.

    @@@@@@@@@@

    this is just another example of why the bible is often viewed as being uninspired- here we have 2 devoted believers in the same book demostrate for all to see that something as simple as "who said what and meant what" cannot be understood

    based on thier position one is right and one is wrong, one is lying or one is telling the truth of the matter,, bottom line this example just highlights the problem in trying to lay claim to having the inside track to the divine one

    is leftnd

  • Kenneson
    Kenneson

    Thank you, Mike Musto. That indeed was a great article!

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped

    Here are the Scriptures that show that JESUS CHRIST picked Paul to be his Apostle, and Paul wrote and did what JESUS CHRIST told him to do.

    Did Paul make mistakes in life, YES, everyone does. Before Jesus appeared to Paul, Paul was DEFINITELY making HUGE MISTAKES.

    Did Paul become an APOSTATE and go against the Teachings of Christ, ABSOLUTELY NOT!

    In everything Paul did, he lifted up JESUS CHRIST, not himself.

    He proclaimed the TRUTH ABOUT CHRIST!

    Acts 9:1: But Saul, still breathing threats and slaughter against the Disciples of the Lord, went to the High Priest,
    Acts 9:2: and asked for letters from him to the synagogues of Damascus, that if he found any who were of the Way, whether men or women, he might bring them bound to Jerusalem.
    Acts 9:3: As he traveled, it happened that he got close to Damascus, and suddenly a light from the sky shone around him.
    Acts 9:4: He fell on the Earth, and heard a voice saying to him, "Saul, Saul, why do you persecute Me?"
    Acts 9:5: He said, "Who are you, Lord?" The Lord said, "I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting.
    Acts 9:6: But rise up, and enter into the city, and you will be told what you must do."
    Acts 9:7: The men who traveled with him stood speechless, hearing the voice, but seeing no one.
    Acts 9:8: Saul arose from the ground, and when his eyes were opened, he saw no one. They led him by the hand, and brought him into Damascus.
    Acts 9:9: He was without sight for three days, and neither ate nor drank.
    Acts 9:10: Now there was a certain Disciple at Damascus named Ananias. The Lord said to him in a vision, "Ananias!" He said, "Behold, it's me, Lord."
    Acts 9:11: The Lord said to him, "Arise, and go to the street which is called Straight, and inquire in the house of Judas for one named Saul, a man of Tarsus. For behold, he is praying,
    Acts 9:12: and in a vision he has seen a man named Ananias coming in, and laying his hands on him, that he might receive his sight."
    Acts 9:13: But Ananias answered, "Lord, I have heard from many about this man, how much evil he did to Your Saints at Jerusalem.
    Acts 9:14: Here he has authority from the Chief Priests to bind all who call on Your Name."
    Acts 9:15: But the Lord said to him, "Go your way, for he is my chosen vessel to bear My Name before the nations and kings, and the children of Israel.
    Acts 9:16: For I will show him how many things he must suffer for My Name's sake."
    Acts 9:17: Ananias departed, and entered into the house. Laying his hands on him, he said, "Brother Saul, the Lord, who appeared to you on the road by which you came, has sent me, that you may receive your sight, and be filled with the Holy Spirit."
    Acts 9:18: Immediately something like scales fell from his eyes, and he received his sight. He arose and was baptized.
    Acts 9:19: He took food and was strengthened. Saul stayed several days with the Disciples who were at Damascus.
    Acts 9:20: Immediately in the synagogues he proclaimed the Christ, that he is the Son of God.
    Acts 9:21: All who heard him were amazed, and said, "Isn't this he who in Jerusalem made havoc of those who called on this Name? And he had come here intending to bring them bound before the Chief Priests!"
    Acts 9:22: But Saul increased more in strength, and confounded the Jews who lived at Damascus, proving that this is the Christ.

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped

    AGuest said:

    As far as the writings go, however, I do know that the scriptures were inspired; that it, they were written when the writers were 'in the spirit'. However, the Gospels were NOT inspired, and thus are NOT scripture. Sorry, but that is true. The scriptures, dear one, are "Moses, the Prophets, Psalms" and the Revelation. If you would read Luke's entry to his accounts, you will see that he neither wrote BY inspiration or at the direction of the spirit, nor did he receive his information FROM the spirit. Rather, he wrote them after interviewing others who told him what they saw... and did this at the behest of Theophilus, a Roman ruler of Greek descent who wanted to discern what was occurring between the Jews and the Christians so as to know 'if these things were true'. I have not lied to you... but only told you what my Lord told ME... so that when I read it, I saw it was indeed true. Perhaps you will, too.

    Let me get this straight (I'm trying to clarify a few of your statements):

    You are saying that you do NOT believe that the 4 Gospels are Inspired by God, correct?

    Also, you believe that only SOME of what Paul wrote was Inspired, correct? (By the way, how do you decide what to "Pick-And-Choose" as being Inspired or not?)

    Let me ask a real big question, since you believe that only the writings of Moses, the Prophets, the Psalms, and Revelation were Inspired by God, and all the other writings in the Bible were written by MEN without Inspiration by God, how is it that you came to know about Jesus Christ (Yeshua Messiah)?

    If you say that the 4 Gospels were NOT Inspired, how can you trust ANYTHING that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John wrote about JESUS?

    Also, how does the Lord talk to you?

    Does He give you special information that no one else knows?

    That's what it sounded like you were saying, but I just want to clarify.

  • AGuest
    AGuest

    May you all have peace!

    Dear JM, you said:

    "But we are permitted to make judgements regarding individuals as shown after full disclosure of the facts and such judgment cannot be dictated to us."

    To that, may I respond that, indeed, we are "permitted". However, our Lord TAUGHT us how we should be, for although he himself transgressed not ONE single Law, he neither judged nore condemned anyone under it, either. Although the Law not only PERMITTED... but REQUIRED him to. Leviticus 5:1

    And yet, he taught us NOT the Law... but the Law's FULFILLMENT, LOVE: Matthew 7:1-5, Luke 6:37; John 8:11

    Thus, all things that we want men to do to US... we must do to them. And me? I want "men"... and God... to forgive my transgressions and show mercy when I have erred against them. I am, then, obligated to do the same.

    When posed with such problems our Lord expects us to judge others but He also expects us to make the right choices not evil ones.

    Actually, our Lords WANTS... and expects... us to forgive... just as HE forgave... and to release... just as HE released.

    Luke 7:43 Simon answered and said, I suppose that he, to whom he forgave most. And he said unto him, Thou hast rightly judged.

    I guess reminding you that this was a hypothetical/parable wouldn't make any difference, would it, and you would still take this to mean that my Lord sanctioned our judging... although he vehemently warned against it? Think of the context, Joe, please. For otherwise, you lend yourself to those who think my Lord contradicted himself, which he didn't. Thus, quoting only PART of the record is deceptive, though I know you don't intend it to be. But you can certainly understand that someone not as... ummmm, 'intelligent' as yourself could take this one part of the entire and claim that Peter actually judged an individual and my Lord agreed with the judgment. And that simply was not the case... was it?

    Dearest DF'd... may I now respond to you? Thank you!

    First, I am directed by my Lord to ask you for what REASON was Paul 'chosen' as an apostle 'to the nations'? There is the erroneous belief taught by many, including the WTBTS, that Paul was 'faithful', although superzealous and misled. While these things are true, for the most part, they are not the reason. (Actually, Paul only LEARNED faith AFTER having an empirical event occur... which is not faith... for faith is the assured expection of the things hoped for, the evident demonstration of realities... though NOT beheld. Although struck blind so that he could not see, Paul did "behold" a flashing light...)

    Second, you asked:

    Let me get this straight (I'm trying to clarify a few of your statements): You are saying that you do NOT believe that the 4 Gospels are Inspired by God, correct?

    That is correct. For a writing to be 'inspired', the writer has to be 'in the spirit' (for that's what "inspired" REALLY means, but we who speak "English" tend to mistransliterate a whole bunch of stuff because we want/need it to fit our paradigm, as "religion" has taught it to us). The writer is "in the spirit" and God, through Christ, is speaking TO them or telling them WHAT to write, as well as TO write it. See Revelation 1:19

    Also, you believe that only SOME of what Paul wrote was Inspired, correct? (By the way, how do you decide what to "Pick-And-Choose" as being Inspired or not?)

    Paul tends to tell you when the holy spirit is directing him. See 1 Corinthians 7:10, 12, 25

    Let me ask a real big question, since you believe that only the writings of Moses, the Prophets, the Psalms, and Revelation were Inspired by God,

    Well, excluding the Revelation, which had not been written yet, that is what LUKE said, and my Lord verified to me. See Luke 24:27, 32, 44, 45. And as I was permitted to share with you before, Luke SAID where he got his information (not from God!), and who he was writing for (not Israel, Jews OR christians, but to Theophilus!). A truly 'inspired' writer will give the GLORY to Jah, DF'd... for such one knows that what he/she "received" is not his/her. Paul never said God/Christ directed him to write. He was simply sharing what he understood, as I am doing now.

    and all the other writings in the Bible were written by MEN without Inspiration by God, how is it that you came to know about Jesus Christ (Yeshua Messiah)?

    Wonderful! Indeed, the scriptures WERE written by men "as they were BORNE ALONG by holy spirit!" And such ones SAID, "And JAH said to me..." etc., etc., etc. None of the Gospel writers said such a thing, but simply wrote a record of what occurred, as they saw it or were told it, while the Master resided here in the flesh. I know ABOUT him because of what is written, in the scriptures, chronologies, histories, gospels (goods news according to, or good news spoken of by), and epistles (letters). I KNOW my Lord, however, because he himself revealed himself TO me.

    If you say that the 4 Gospels were NOT Inspired, how can you trust ANYTHING that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John wrote about JESUS?

    FIRST, just because something IS inspired does not make it trustworthy, does it? Indeed, are we not to TEST the inspired expression for the very fact that not ALL inspired expression originate with God?! Second, I know what to trust... and NOT to trust... because I heed the words at John 5:39, 40. And thus, rather than putting my trust in earthling man... I go the ONE about whom such things were written... and ASK! "How am I to understand this, Lord?" "What did this one truly mean when he wrote...?"

    And actually, I have VERY little occasion to do that, for when I listen and OBEY the voice of my Lord, in turn, HE tells me what such and such meant. And he NEVER lies to me.

    Proverbs 8:4-11

    Also, how does the Lord talk to you?

    With his voice. From above the Ark of my Covenant with JAH, for which he (my Lord) mediates. He resides within my temple and speaks from there. And yes, I hear him... quite clearly.

    1 Corinthians 3:16 Ephesians 2:19-21 John 10:1-3, 27

    Does He give you special information that no one else knows?

    Actually, at times it does seem that way, but I am sure that SOMEWHERE someone else gets it, too, for the things he tells me I know he wishes to tell ALL of his sheep; in fact, ALL of mankind. But not all wish to 'hear', sooooo... But I am not different than the ones before me who heard: I am sure that when THEY said "God/Christ told me such and such," they were met with the same disbelief. For as Korah said, "We are all of us holy," and so why should JAH just speak to one or two or three? Truly, for the same reason as back then... although JAH had Moses congregate ALL of the people before the mountain... it was, after all, the PEOPLE... who did not WANT to hear. Did that stop such ones from professing that they indeed heard? No. Me? I can't help it; it was a "gift" of the spirit that was bestowed upon me... and I received/accept it... willingly... and the responsibility that comes with it.

    1 Corinthians 12:10

    That's what it sounded like you were saying, but I just want to clarify.

    Did you? I am not certain that what I said is what you expected. I THINK you expected me to backtrack and deny what I know to be true. I sincerely apologize, but I can't do that, for to do so would be to deny the Christ... just as Peter did... when I know better. I have less desire to disappoint him (and my being ashamed of him before men, by denying that I indeed hear his voice for fear of being thought "mad"... would do that)... than I have of disappointing you.

    If you want to know what I hear and how I hear, dear DF'd, may I ask you to click on "Members" above, and find my name ("AGuest") and click on threads posted or commented on by me. That should help you get a fairly good picture of what it is you wish to know.

    I bid you peace, both you and dear Joseph, and I am your servant, as I am servant to ALL those of the Household of God, Israel, as well as those that go with them, by means of a true anointing with the 'water of life', the spirit of the Holy One of Israel, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, whose name is JAH... of Armies... by means of His Son and Christ, my Lord, JAHESHUA MISCHAJAH,

    SJ, a slave of Christ

    Edited by - AGuest on 23 September 2002 0:9:7

    Edited by - AGuest on 23 September 2002 0:25:6

    Edited by - AGuest on 23 September 2002 0:26:16

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped

    Thank You SJ (AGuest) for your Post.

    No, you definitely have not disappointed me.

    Truly, my only goal is to make sure and test what you (and anyone else) says, to make sure it harmonizes with the Holy Scriptures (because Paul wrote and said, that if anyone else gives you another Gospel or Good News beyond what is written, Not to believe it).

    I understand what you are saying, and I have nothing but Christian love for you, a fellow slave of Christ.

    I'm not sure I believe everything you said, but that's what's great about having FREEDOM, which was definitely not available in the Watchtower Society.

    But, the main point is, you, and I, and JosephMalik, all believe in, and love the Father and His Son, and the Son's Sacrifice!

    I am not going to question or judge you, when you say that Christ is giving you knowledge. I am glad that you have a relationship with Yeshua Messiah our Lord!

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped

    P.S. I am sorry if I sounded rude or upset on my Post I made the other day.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit