Why Are the Democrats So Evil?

by cellomould 66 Replies latest jw friends

  • LDH
    LDH

    OK, just a side point that may or may not have bearing on this discussion.

    Did you ever notice it's the RICH people who want "less government?"

    Of course, that may be their terminology for "less government services for the poor."

    Proof? You never hear the rich talking about cutting government programs that they need equal access to, such as Police, Fire, or Public Utilities.

    Of course, if it's Section 8 housing for the poor, or Food Stamps, somehow those programs are the ones that contribute to the "too much government" scenario.

    Poor people need government human services as a safety net. Rich people don't. They want those programs cut.

    It's not the Republicans vs. the Democrats, it's the Haves vs. the Have-nots, period.

    Reborn, don't be too hard on Farkel. He can get as good as he gives. Nice to see ya, I been rally busy lately.

    Lisa

  • Reborn2002
    Reborn2002

    Did you ever notice it's the RICH people who want "less government?"

    Of course, that may be their terminology for "less government services for the poor."

    ---------------------

    It's not the Republicans vs. the Democrats, it's the Haves vs. the Have-nots, period.

    An EXCELLENT point Lisa.

    In no way or fashion was I insinuating that the Democratic party is somehow devoid of guilt in many of the problems which currently plague this great nation. But to sit here and listen to people spew political rhetoric to defend their allegiance despite the facts proving otherwise makes me nauseated.

    I made the point very clear in my first post:

    Both parties are guilty. How can you continuously defend one over the other?

    What part of that can some of you not understand?

    PS - Good to see you too LDH.. been a while.

  • Farkel
    Farkel

    Reborn,

    : You are obviously geriatric enough to have been around back then. Enjoy your time left in a wheelchair spouting hatred and sarcasm while hiding behind that Mad Magazine picture icon.

    I notice that political differences bring out the best in people, as your obvious ad hominem proves.

    Now explain to the whole world who's reading this, how your statement above is an "argument."

    By the way, I was born in 1948. Roosevelt died in 1944. So you don't even have a simplest of facts right. All you have is your position and you will attack me and my age in an idiotic attempt to "support" it.

    If you want to play ball with me, make sure you bring a glove.

    Farkel

  • Farkel
    Farkel

    Reborn goes ballistic:

    : Capiesce?

    Capiche. Can't spell, either.

    : George Herman Walker Bush

    Can't get names right, either.

    : Clinton was in office for EIGHT YEARS, so your saying George Herman Walker Bush in his FOUR years in office was responsible for directly setting up Clinton's administration for EIGHT years of prosperity? You have GOT to be fucking joking.

    Not joking at all. I never said that, and I CHALLENGE you to prove anywhere that I said that. You are making stuff up. Reagan started the recovery that he inherited from Carter. If you'll recall, I said that the whole of economies take time to move, and I said that Reagan/Bush did the advance work that allowed Clinton to walk into a situation where the economy was ready to bounce back. And it did. Others have dealt with issues of the National Debt and the military spending that Reagan supported. Only bleeding-heart Liberals will not thank him for bringing down the Soviet Union for doing do. You ever have drills in grade school about what we kids would do in a thermonuclear war with the Soviet Union, Reborn? Well, I did. Don't take the fall of the Soviet Union for granted, bubba. Reagan outspent and bankrupted those Commie bastards, and it cost my Country a whole bunch of money to do it. It was the best investment we ever made sinc the Marshall Plan. You probably don't know about that, either, as your posts show a distinct lack of historical knowledge.

    : After all, that's all you are, a JOKE.

    Ad hominem. Not a valid argument.

    : It is indeed logical to assume that a President could walk into an environment heading into either a recession or an economic boom. I never said it was not possible. NEVER AGAIN put words into my mouth. Capiesce?

    No need to do so. You already made a fool out of yourself by arguing that Clinton was solely responsible for the economic boom of the 1990's.

    : Ronald Reagan was President EIGHT years before Bush was President. So Bush Sr inherited a shitty economy from another Republican? Now that would just be a fly in the ointment for Yeru and everyone else who has been defending Republicans time and again with illogical reasoning.

    Once again, you are ignoring facts. Reagan inherited a shitty economy from Carter. Why do you think he defeated Carter? Carter (a good and honest man) made the mistake of blaming the American public for the economic problems of his time. Ever hear of his "malaise" speech?

    : Thanks for the observation jackass.

    Thanks for your solid and logical arguments, Reborn.

    : The point I made was that Yeru and others are defending the Republican party even in cases that they do not warrant credit.

    The Republican party is every bit as corrupt as the Democratic party. I'm not a Republican. I'm a Libertarian. The Libertarian party is every bit as currupt as any other party, and I don't even endorse THEIR platform or candidates. My politics are philosophical and no human is ready to meet the challenges I have in my mind for them to meet. In the meantime, I choose the best idiots that are available. And they ain't Liberals.

    : Other people may enjoy your never-ending condescending, smart-ass comments, but personally I believe your just an asshole.

    I would think that if you would re-read your comments about me, you might be moved to look in your own mirror, Reborn.

    :: That opinion is all Bible-Based(tm).

    : From now on, if I want your opinion, I'll give it to you.

    Don't bring an unloaded weapon into a brain fight, Reborn. And leave your rage somewhere else next time. It taints your ability to think clearly.

    Farkel

    Edited by - Farkel on 27 September 2002 3:15:4

  • Dismembered
    Dismembered

    Farkel,

    Again Touche, well said & ditto

    PS

    I wonder what people think and talk about when they take a tour through the Oval Office after "Fornigate". i.e. (Hey Mommy/Daddy I wonder where it was in this office that President Clinokio got lewinskied?)

    Talk about taking a most revered icon such as the White House/Oval Office and "demonizing" it with that kind of behavior shame! shame! shame! He needs to get his pee pee slapped.

    Dismembered

  • Yerusalyim
    Yerusalyim

    TeeJay,

    You said,

    You guys are killing me!!! Before it's over, Yeru, you're going to be blaming The Greatest President of the Twentieth Century for Hurricane Isidore! Jeepers!!

    No way would I blame President Reagan for a Hurricane. However, if your implication is that Clinton was the greatest president of the 20th Century then all I can say is BULL SH*T! The man was and is a liar, a womanizer, and a cretin.

    Liza, if it's the haves verses the have nots then why is Clinton a Democrat? The man is and was (thanks to Hilary) FILTHY RICH, as is "Babs Streisand, and countless others, the average income of the participants of the Democratic National Convention was over $90,000. No, what the problem is is that the Dems want to solve all problems by throwing OUR money at it rather than dealing with core issues. I make well less than 36,000 a year. If my income was figured hourly my 12 hour days would add up fast, not to mention the 24 and 36 hour days I've had to pull, my time away from home and family (at one time I had spent over half my married life away from wife, family, and home. Yet I'm a republican. Me, a guy that used to get welfare, am a Republican.

    REBORN<

    It never ceases to amaze me when I see people blindly defending the Republican party and Dumb Ass Dubya as if they are infallible.

    I've said the Republicans or Bush are infallible? No, I've said I believe the course he and they want to set for the nation is better than than of Clinton.

    Fact - The United States enjoyed the greatest period of prosperity in the financial markets in it's history (.com explosion, etc) during the Clinton Administration. Do you deny that? Or shall I pull up substantiated evidence of the GDP and economic prosperity this nation enjoyed in the late 1990's versus the general downturn since Bush was inaugurated?

    This great economic growth was an overinflated economy that HAD to crash. It was allowed to grow like that because Clinton allowed the folks at ENRON, WORLDCOM, etc to cook the books. And don't forget that the GAO has already stated the Clinton figures in the last year of his reign were inflated by 30%. Further, the recession Bush inherited began under Clinton. There is no denying that fact, or that the Tax cut has pulled us out of this recession.

    Oh I suppose Clinton is to blame for the economy that Bush Sr. and Reagan incited before he was ever President? PLEASE.

    Actually, because of what Reagan did in office and then Bush, who's agenda was thrown off by the first Iraq war, the economy grew under Clinton. Probably had a LOT to do with DEREGULATION and not being required to spend as much on defense because of the END OF THE COLD WAR.

    Clinton in office = economic prosperity, robust economy

    You forgot to add needless intervention in Bosnia (he should have used his influence to get Europe to take responsibility for it) embarrasment of the nation and our military in Somalia because he wouldn't let commanders have the equipment they said they needed, and he pulled the Marines out. You also didn't mention that he wanted to create a "Health Care" system that would have consumed 7% of the GNP and would have lead to our paying taxes like the Germans (who pay upwards of 50% in taxes). You also forgot to mention bombing a babyformula factory in Sudan to take the heat off himself for Monica "Mouth Peice" Lewinsky.

    W Bush in office = war with Iraq, recession, bad economy

    All of which Bush inherited from Clinton.

    Can you say Halliburton Company scandal etc for Bush and Cheney? You act like the Republican party is snow white. For Christ's sake, how can you get more hypocritical than to push legislation to prevent CEO's from committing actions on behalf of their own financial interest that HE HIMSELF did 10 years ago?

    Can you say that ENRON execs had more access to Clinton than any other folks outside of politics.

    You also said the war with Iraq. HA!

    Was not Desert Storm BEFORE Clinton went into office? Forgive me if I am wrong, but Bush Sr was responsible for getting the military within sight of Baghdad, and then LEAVING Hussein in power

    . Yes, DS was BEFORE Clinton, and I've said time and again that the US made a mistake by not taking out Saddam then, I wonder if this was due to all the pressure from the Democrats? Actually though, it was Bush 1 bowing to world opinion (which is why we should NEVER trust the UN or World Opinion, but rather do what is in our best interests. HOWEVER, what I meant about WAR with Iraq, is that the current mess is here in part because Clinton ignored Iraq.

    I

    When you mix a lie with truth the statement becomes a lie.

    I've mixed opinions with facts, it's called politics, I've stated NO LIES

    Of course, if you want to get down to it.. Bush is an illegitimate President in my book. Over a MILLION more people across this nation voted for Al Gore. So much for the will of the people being heard huh? Ironic that the state that comes into question during the scandal had his brother as Governor.. and when the case went to the Supreme Court the Justices who voted in Bush's favor were appointed by.. you guessed it.. his dear old Dad.

    That arguement is TIRED and doesn't hold water, regardless of who counted the votes, or how the votes were counted, Bush won Florida, and therefore the Election. Gore dirtied politics beyond all reckoning by forcing this into the Supreme court. Gore, who wanted to discount all the military absentee ballots. Plus, lets not forget that the majority of absentee ballots aren't counted anyhow because of ridiculous requirements, plus the millions of folks who didn't vote on because of the announcement that Gore won Florida. Bush is the LEGALLY ELECTED president. If Gore couldn't win his own state, he didn't need to be President. THANK GOD we had Bush in office for 9-11, Gore would have bombed an abandoned Al Qaeda training camp and proclaimed victory!

    He sure pushes the War on Terror agenda continously. It is his saving grace.

    It's his Job as President.

    9/11 saved his Presidency from being plagued as one of the WORST in the last 100 years. I wont go off on any further rant because personally I cant fucking stand any of the greedy bastards.

    That is indeed a subject for great debate, and we'll never know. Which Greedy bastards ya talking about, the Dems or Reps?

    Have a nice time responding to my post. Im sure you will find some excuse to use so that you can bastardize the Democratic party and make the GOP look like the knights in shining armor. (gimme a mother fv<|<ing break)

    The Democrat's hypocracy has bastardized the Party enough, I don't have to do so.

    Both parties are guilty. How can you continuously defend one over the other?

    I can agree with the first half of that statement. I defend the Republicans because I think the road they lead us on is correct.

    Edited by - Yerusalyim on 27 September 2002 9:55:57

  • Dismembered
    Dismembered

    Teejay said, meaning Clinton

    If it weren't prohibited by the Constitution, he'd be
    president right now.
    Well if my memory serves me well, and it does. Fact: Reagan won in 2 consecutive LANDSLIDES, he was the most beloved president of this century, and would still be... see quote below
    If it weren't prohibited by the Constitution, he'd be
    president right now.

    ever heard the term "Reagan Democrats" hmmmm

    Dismembered

    Edited by - Dismembered on 27 September 2002 15:46:21

    Edited by - Dismembered on 27 September 2002 15:49:3

  • Pork Chop
    Pork Chop

    The funniest thing that's been said defending Clinton is concerning his great work on the Israeli/Palestinian situation. Wow, we can all see how well that worked. I'd say that's about on a level with the rest of his accomplishments.

    Many knowledgeable people in the field say that Clinton's glory seeking actually made the situation worse.

  • Crazy151drinker
    Crazy151drinker

    Give me the democratic party of John F. Kennedy or Harry Truman and they would win by a landslide (They were American's first and Democrats second)

    Double,

    The Chicago Mob helped get Kennedy elected! I dont call that very American (well I guess that is!!). Its no wonder he and his brother got popped. The Mob helped them and the f-d over the mob! Dumbass's....

    If you want to check out a REAL secret society that has a lot of POWERFULL members (im not saying they actually control them, just that they all belonged) do a search for the SKULL AND BONES club from YALE. Tons of people were in it, included Dubya and his dad.

  • Farkel
    Farkel

    : Give me the democratic party of John F. Kennedy or Harry Truman and they would win by a landslide (They were American's first and Democrats second)

    Agreed. But the democrats of those eras were not like the democrats today. Today, they have nothing to offer but criticism of what everyone but them are doing and they only offer vague platitudes that are meaningless. "We don't let the Republicans take away your social security" is as good of an example as any, and of course, a lie. Can you imagine Harry Truman or JFK demanding that China contribute to his campaign fund or he wouldn't deal with them? That alone constitutes treason in my book, yet that is exactly what the "greatest" president of the 20th century and his vice president did.

    Farkel

    Edited by - Farkel on 27 September 2002 17:30:2

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit