"Blame the victim, and then you don't have to accept your own responsibility for what you've said."
Francois,
This is a summary of what I term the "OVERZEALOUS BROTHERS" doctrine. Perhaps this is the origin of this practice. It is certain they have recycled it many times afterward:
The overzealous brothers doctrine/defense/gambit:
"Some anticipated that the work would end in 1925, but the Lord did not state so. The difficulty was that the friends inflated their imaginations beyond reason; and that when their imaginations burst asunder, they were inclined to throw away everything." (Watchtower 1926 p. 232.)
the proper perspective reply
Of course, having looked at the original quotes, we now understand that the "Some" who "anticipated the work would end in 1925," was really the Society who had lead the brothers to that conclusion. Contrast the statement "but the Lord did not state so," with what they said earlier in 1922:
The original real quote from the WT:
"This chronology is not of man, but of God. Being of divine origin and divinely corroborated, present-truth chronology stands in a class by itself, absolutely and unqualifiedly correct...." (Watchtower, July 15, 1922 p. 217).
EXTRACTED FROM
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/forum/thread.asp?id=14841&site=3
with acknowledgments and compliments to Uncle Onion
Mustang