The Sleeping Dragon is Awakening (page 2)

Nathan Natas

The world is ruled by the agressive use of force. I prefer that the preponderance of force should be in the hands of the USA and not in the hands of a Wahabi aspiring to 14th centruy culture. The Wahabis can join their 14th century under the sands of time.

RandomTask

Yes, Bill Clinton did not go into Somalia, neither did he go into the Balkans, right? Bill Clinton's lack of foreign policy in dealing with terrorists, remember the USS Cole was suicide bombed in 2000, during Clinton's administration, by the same people who bombed the World Trade Centers. Nearly 10 years of not doing anything about Saddam and worldwide terrorism led to the attacks on Sept. 11. We do not live in a bubble, there are evil people out there who want us dead, we have to be aware of that fact and act accordingly.

RunningMan

My mom says the terrorists could be the "King of the North".

Better watch out.

teenyuck

I, personally, am waiting for Hillary to run for Prez...then we can continue the Clinton agenda. I hope she gets a studly intern and we can hear all about it. Do you think she smokes cigars?

Perhaps she will tap into Bill's vast gray matter

Yes, the more I contemplate the future, I think Hillary would be an outstanding president.

Mary

I hope Bush bombs those bastards right in to the stone age..............what's it going to take? A few more planes crashing in to buildings in Canada, England, Germany, France, Portugal, Spain killing thousands more to get world suport?? ...........Saddam Hussein knew all about September 11th and he fully supported it. He's insane, he's a despot, a tyrant and don't think for a second he wouldn't kill all of us if the opportunity arose (after all, we're just a bunch of infidels).

Perry

Hi Mary,

As much as I want peace (lord knows I have a business to run that will without question suffer much during a war), I'm willing to go with the Prez on this one. Saddam was definitely involved in the first Twin Towers bombiong attempt and I believe that the President will show a new connection to the successful one before we attack. I agree that we shouldn't wait for another attack.

Concerning a possible WW III ... That is such crap. Everybody loses with that deal. It is too damn expensive and everybody knows it. Why take a chance on losing everything when you are not attacked? Believe me, this too will pass.

The American public has shown their support in the mid-term elections. The will of the people has spoken. We neeed to put aside our differences and support our duly elected government. There will plenty of time to address our own political and social policy differences in the future.

I think we will prevail very quickly.

heathen

For one thing most people in this country are infedels if you look the word up in the dictionary it simpy means unbelievers or one without religious faith.I can agree that saddam is a despot deserving of having his entrails removed but I think it is unwise for the US to run all over the world blowing up countries and playing nation building with a buch of primitive cultures that want to do nothing but start a holy war in the name of islam against pretty much anyone including the muslim groups that believe different .

UnDisfellowshipped

Hey, Perry,

Why was there World War I and World War II?

Obviously something caused those Wars to happen.

Why couldn't there be a Third?

Perry

Hi Undisfellowshipped,

The world was a much different place then with very different means for countries to support themselves. Some people got left out of the imperial land grab game, got pissed off, and decided to let others know they could be powerful if they wanted to. We didn't listen and they wanted to.

Now, world economies are very interdependent. I am not suggesting that a world war is impossible.....just improbable. Highly improbable.

UnDisfellowshipped

Thanks Perry,

I definitely understand what you are saying, and I sincerely hope there is no WWIII.

The Sleeping Dragon is Awakening

Share this