jonadab, you said:
But answer a question for me or for yourself. If it was God's original purpose to have mankind live forever in a beautiful home on earth and his purpose has not changed, how could this be accomplished if wickedness was not removed?
If this was, and is God's purpose, then I agree wickedness would have to be removed. We would then have to define "wickedness." The WTS's definition of wickedness is any person that does not agree with it's doctrines. I do not agree with this definition.
For as they were in those days before the flood, eating and drinking, men marrying and women being given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark; and they took no note until the flood came and swept them all away, so the presence of the Son of man will be." It wasn't so much that everyone was wicked and evil, but that they were so caught up in their everyday lives they had no time for their Creator.
So if one is eating, drinking, getting married, or giving their child in marriage, which I believe are all gifts of life, it means one is not spiritual, doesn't help others, cannot possibly be leading a decent life ? And when God flooded and destroyed all that "wickedness," which by the way included slaughtering babies while preserving two swine, why didn't God set about restoring paradise at that time ? Too convenient, maybe there should be yet another population brought about to suffer, only to be destroyed?
Doesn't God deserve our consideration, our attention and love if he is the one we owe our very lives to?
I most certainly agree that the one I owe very life to deserves my love. And I, along with many people other than JWs, are most appreciative of this life, even if this were to be the only life we were given. It makes no difference if it's 30 years of life, or eternity, I would live my life in the same way, with an appreciation and humbleness. How about nurses that spend their lives in Third World Countries in order to care for dying children and the elderly? Who is anyone to say or believe that they don't have a true love for God or life just because they are not of your faith ? They are not JWs, therefore according to your religion, they will be slaughtered at Armageddon. Do you truly believe this to be a Christ-like attitude ?
Doesn't God have the right to preserve life and take a life that he has created?
I agree God can do whatever he wants. So do you feel that I have the right to take my child's life because I gave it to her ? How about a right to get an abortion?
But where are you going to draw the line at who enjoys this future and who doesn't? I wouldn't want to be the one who makes this decision and I dare say that most of us don't want to be in that position either. I'm glad that Jehovah has set the standards, can read what is in our hearts and is in the position to judge righteously.
You can't have this both ways Jonadab. On one hand you say that Jehovah is in the position to judge, but on the other hand you allow the governing body of Jehovah's Witnesses to instruct you to believe that if one is not a Witness one will die at Armageddon, which is right around the corner. If that is not "judging," what is ? And Witnesses go along with this, saying nothing !
There are some truly decent people in the "world," just as there are some truly decent people that are Witnesses. This is the point, the WTS would have one believe that it is cut and dry. If one is not a Witness, they cannot possibly know God or be a spiritual person. They have Witnesses convinced that to abandon the WTS is to abandon God. This is utter nonsense and self righteousness and a, successful I might add, attempt to its members. You sound like a thinking, sincere person, you should check into the history of the religion you practice. pyramids, etc. better yet, ask someone in the hall. I bet they don't even know !
peace, christina
Edited by - deddaisy on 20 December 2002 22:7:34
Edited by - deddaisy on 20 December 2002 22:27:48