UN FINDS WMD...OK saddam lovers, what now?

by dolphman 280 Replies latest social current

  • IronGland
    IronGland

    What happened to 'The axis of evil' and 'youre with us or you're with the terrorists'. Saddam may be able to get some nukes and it seems like he probably still has chem/bio weapons. Fine. I really don't have a problem taking him out and even if I did, we've got thousands of men in the desert now and I don't think they are coming home except via Baghdad.

    However, why are we offering to negotiate and give aid to N. Korea? I realise that a Korean war is more problematic than a war against Iraq, but what happened to all the tough rhetoric? They're jumping up and down yelling "we're building nukes" we're gonna crush you etc etc. You'd think we would have at least positioned a carrier or two off their coast or began sending more soldiers to the DMZ.

    BUSH ON NORTH KOREA: "WE MUST INVADE IRAQ"

    WASHINGTON, DCWith concern over North Korea's nuclear capabilities growing, President Bush reassured the American people Monday that "extreme force" will be used to remove Saddam Hussein from power if the Iraqi president fails to give up suspected weapons of mass destruction.

    Above: President Bush speaks to reporters about the growing crisis with North Korea, vowing to overthrow Saddam Hussein.

    "For years, Kim Jong Il has acted in blatant disregard of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation Of Nuclear Weapons, and last week, he rejected it outright," Bush told reporters after a National Security Council meeting on North Korea. "We cannot allow weapons of mass destruction to remain in the hands of volatile, unpredictable leaders. Which is exactly why we must act quickly and decisively against Saddam Hussein."

    A member of Bush's "axis of evil," North Korea sparked international outcry in October 2002 after announcing that it had a uranium-enrichment program. After ousting U.N. inspectors, leader Kim Jong Il has continued to defy orders to halt the program.

    "I applaud the International Atomic Energy Agency's condemnation of North Korea's nuclear efforts," Bush said. "I trust that the world community will act capably and decisively in this matteras capably and decisively as the U.S. will act against Iraq."

    According to Bush, North Korea and Iraq both pose "significant threats" to important U.S. allies.

    "Our friends South Korea and Japan are justifiably fearful of North Korea's emergent nuclear and chemical-weapons technologies," Bush said. "These nations are forced to live with the constant threat of aggression looming over their heads, just as our friends Saudi Arabia and Israel do. The time has come to complete the unfinished business of a decade ago and oust Saddam Hussein."

    Above: Kim Jong Il.

    Added Bush: "This man tried to kill my dad."

    U.S. intelligence experts say North Korea likely has one or two nuclear bombs, with plans to rapidly expand its arsenal in the coming years. With two nuclear reactors under construction, the nation could have a system to enrich uranium by 2005, producing enough plutonium for two bombs a year.

    "North Korea has a full-scale nuclear program underway, one which may even now have the capability of striking the western U.S.," Bush said. "Even more alarming, Iraq is actively trying to scrounge up enough money to buy something nuclear on the black market, ideally something that can fly through the air."

    Bush outlined his administration's plan for the crisis in North Korea, which includes maintaining an open dialogue with Pyongyang and deploying massive troops and materiel to the Gulf region.

    At a Jan. 10 press conference, Bush had strong words for the North Korean dictator.

    "Kim Jong Il, you have withdrawn from international nuclear treaties and cruelly starved your own people," Bush said. "The world at large will not let your evil deeds go unchallenged. Someone, somewhere will hold you accountable, sooner or later. I do not know who this person is, but somebody will."

    Above: A North Korean soldier stands guard over missiles so advanced, Iraq is prohibited from possessing them.

    "North Korea has been pouring its limited resources into development of a huge military force at the expense of its own people's well-being," Bush continued. "Somebody should take decisive action against this, just as the U.S. did in stopping the Taliban and will soon do in ousting Saddam Hussein."

    Seeking to pressure North Korea, a communist nation since the end of the Korean War, into compliance with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation Of Nuclear Weapons, the U.S. has cut off all economic and humanitarian aid.

    "By providing support to North Korea, America was indirectly propping up an oppressive regime," Bush said. "That food and fuel will be much better used by the proud men and women of the U.S. militarysuch as the 45,000 members of the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force, who at this moment are in California preparing for deployment to the Middle East."

    "You have my prayers, Camp Pendleton," added Bush, giving an officer's salute. "Now, let's roll."

  • Crazy151drinker
    Crazy151drinker

    Dont worry Folks,

    Well just build the U.N. a brand new Building in IRAQ that way we can get rid of both the bastards at the same time! Even the JWs will be happy! And you guys think Nukes are bad!! Silly people....

  • IronGland
    IronGland

    to email: The fact that you have publicly admitted to listening to and enjoying 'Creed' seriously calls your judgement into question. You need a disclaimer on your posts "Im a fan of Creed, therefore take all comments with a large grain of salt".

  • pettygrudger
    pettygrudger
    The WarHeads are empty because it's dangerous to store them with chemicals too much of a chance of an accident.

    EXACTLY!!! We don't know how old these warheads are - they could be left over from 91. And as I state above, Iraq has supposedly provided information stating these items were indeed "claimed" per the UN resolution.

    I'm sorry - but none of you have made a decent argument on why this is the US's right to go against the UN and engage in war that no other country agrees is the appropriate way to handle this. I think the US would fair far better in the world's eyes if we did let the UN do its job, proving we want to work within the world community. We've already done so much damage because of our dear President in the world community, I feel this could surely lead to something much bigger from alot of corners if we go against everyone now.

  • Satanus
    Satanus

    I sometimes wonder if all military personel are a bit brainwashed.

    SS heading for his bombshelter

    Edited by - saintsatan on 16 January 2003 17:59:13

  • LB
    LB

    OK time out kids. If you are anti war, anti bush, anti american or anti whatever, it doesn't matter what is uncovered in Iraq. You'll poo poo it and claim it's all bullshit and that you need more proof.

    But Simon I agree with you. My unloaded hangun can't kill anyone. So next time I fly I'm demanding they allow me to take it. Ummm, can I have your home phone number in case I don't explain it right???

  • email
    email

    LOL @ IronGland...

    Apparently now we have to get into personal attacks when we all of the sudden lack of intelligent statements to contribute to the debate...

    Edited by - email on 16 January 2003 17:1:59

  • JH
    JH

    In Iraq, they found EMPTY warheads

    and EMPTY heads

    Edited by - JH on 16 January 2003 17:13:59

  • IronGland
    IronGland

    Speaking of WMD...

    (Off topic, removed - sorry IronGland)

    You think? Would YOU trust a man who listens to Creed?

    Edited by - Simon on 16 January 2003 17:54:6

    Edited by - Irongland on 16 January 2003 18:45:9

  • IronGland
    IronGland

    Listen all you traitorous hippies. North Korea and OBL hate us because we are free. What would happen if one of these maniacs got a nuk ya lur weapon? Therefore we MUST invade Iraq. Why do you people hate America? Saddam is also stupid. If he were smart he would have developed Nukes before confronting America. Then instead of Iraq being invaded, we would have just told him "you are a bad bad man, here, we'll send you some food and crap if you'll quit building them. No? Ok, well can we be friends?"

    Edited by - irongland on 16 January 2003 17:47:2

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit