Jesus the Maintenance Man

by peacefulpete 25 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • peacefulpete
    peacefulpete

    I posted on another thread what I thought was an interesting angle, seldom discussed regarding the role of God/Logos in holding creation together and its maintenance. Most moderns think of the universe as a self-perpetuating machine, but ancients looked to the God/s to ensure order continued and fertility returned year after year. We read, throughout the OT, of Jews performing prescribed ritual and festivals to ensure God's blessing and Providence. Before learning better, I always thought of that as requesting specific divine intervention in a natural order rather than ensuring God's continuing action preventing a descent into unpredictable chaos.

    For example: Jeremiah 5:24: "They do not say to themselves, ‘Let us fear the Lord our God, who gives autumn and spring rains in season, who assures us of the regular weeks of harvest."

    Unsurprisingly the role of holding together the natural world was attributed to Wisdom/Word/Logos. Wisdom dwelt with creation, kept the cycles in motion, the boundaries and limits in place. This concept flowed seamlessly through Philo's logos to the Christ.

    Although she is but one, she can do all things, and while remaining in herself, she renews all things; Wisdom 7

    "The Logos of the living God is the bond of everything, holding all things together and binding all the parts, and prevents them from being dissolved and separated." Philo, On the Creation of the World
    He is the reflection of God’s glory and the exact imprint of God’s very being, and he sustains all things by his powerful word. Heb 1:3

    And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together." Col 1

    It all goes back to the ancient cosmic struggle against chaos. We often focus on the defeat of chaos at the moment of creation but forget creation required maintenance. It seems many of the Jews assign that role to the Logos.

  • KalebOutWest
    KalebOutWest

    Peacefulpete wrote:

    It seems many of the Jews assign that role to the Logos.

    Actually this was only what Philo wrote, not what Jews believed or understood about the universe or God, etc..

    Philo's work is still studied by many scholars today for its historical and philosophical significance. While he was a Jew, he was not necessarily always writing as a Jew or claiming that what he was saying was representing wide stream Jewish through. There is no such thing. There is general Jewish practice, but there is no and never has been a single mainstream Jewish dogma. (As the saying goes: two Jews, three synagogues.)

    Philo of Alexandria (c. 20 BCE--50 CE) was neither a rabbi or a Jewish theologian. He was a Hellenistic philosopher. He just so happened to be of Jewish descent, so people tend to think that because he had Jewish DNA everything he said or wrote about was a Jewish thesis representing official Jewish thought or worthy of some Jewish version of the imprimatur. Not so.

    Philo was experimenting with breaking through to his Jewish contemporaries by introducing to them what he loved about Greek philosophy, particularly Platonism, and thought he could reconcile Greek philosophy with Jewish theology somehow in order to get Jews to somehow become what he was, namely a Hellenist.

    Philo's work heavily influenced Christians, especially the theology of the Gospel of John where Jesus Christ is identified as the incarnate Logos. However there are significant differences between Philo's philosophical theories and the Christian incarnation. Philo saw the Logos as Divine Reason and a Creative Power, often as an intermediary being between God and the created world.

    Philo's teachings were not accepted by mainstream Judaism because Philo was attempting to replace religious concepts with Greek philosophy, particularly Platonism, using these ideas as a substitute for the Hebrew Scriptures. As you might imagine, such a suggestion did not sit well with the Jewish scholars and rabbinical teachers of the time. (A similar suggestion was made by Rabbi Sherwin Wine in the late 1960s, suggesting that Humanism replace theistic language in the Reform liturgy, which as you can imagine was met with a similar response.)

    Philo left more of a mark on Christianity than an on his own people as the Christians employed Hellenistic thought to help explain facets of the Trinity. Judaism speaks of the universe in very naturalistic terms and has since its beginnings. While there have been attempts, like Philo and even during the Persian Era to introduce various philosophies and dabbles with the supernatural, the view that God is part of the natural universe and vice versa always tends to win out (though again, there is no one dogmatic set of doctrines on the matter).

  • peacefulpete
    peacefulpete
    What Philo wrote was not... representing wide stream Jewish through. There is no such thing.

    Not sure what you are saying. The concept predates Philo and his Alexandrian school by centuries, The anthropomorphized "Word" (Memra) for example was widely read in the Targums. Even early rabbinic writings include the concept, at times referring to it/them as Metatron. It would be surprising if not all Jews were at least familiar with it in some form. However, it would be incorrect to say all understood it identically, because as you said, there was 'no and never has been a single mainstream Jewish dogma'. We should expect that Christian origins were not located in the conservative Temple cult form of Judaism but among the disenfranchised or disillusioned, there certainly were many that fit that description long before Philo and his school.

    I was not arguing simply for the concept of 'second power' that has been well established. I was describing a specific role as the agency of maintaining creation. It is self-evident from the texts that many Jews had assigned that role to the Logos/Wisdom etc. I don't think I am overstating that.

    I understand that in later centuries Rabbinic Judaism renounced the second power theology in a sort of 'Restoration Movement' of their own. Much like the Restoration Movement within 19th century Christianity, it involved more than a little revisionism. But you know that of course.

  • peacefulpete
    peacefulpete

    Since you are here Kaleb, explain if you don't mind the Almidah. I found it interesting that it seems to yet include the idea that God is directly (providentially) involved in weather.

    In summer say: He causes the dew to descend. In winter say: He causes the wind to blow and the rain to fall.

    Translation of the Weekday Amidah - Chabad.org

  • KalebOutWest
    KalebOutWest

    The Amidah (or T'filah) is the central prayer in the three major prayer services of most Jews: morning, afternoon, and evening.

    What you are reading is merely a line from it that (in some denominations) changes according to the weather that one would normally experience in the land of Israel (namely from December 4th until the first day of Passover).

    It does not mean that Jews believe that God is directly involved in the weather.

    In fact, Jews do not believe that God actually listens to prayer. He might, but then again God might not. That is not what prayer is about in Judaism.

    It is sort of difficult to talk about prayer in English because we are not using the same word that we use in Hebrew for "prayer." In English, the word "prayer" means to "ask." But the word in Hebrew doesn't mean that.

    The Hebrew word t'filah means to judge oneself, to inspect what you are. This is why Jewish prayers consist of fixed words.

    Instead of believing that one's prayers are being heard by God or one is asking God for something, like Jehovah's Witnesses do, Jews are doing something entirely different. Jews believe they are mostly hearing God talk to them.

    Much of the prayers consist of words from the Psalms and Scripture as well as from the sages that go back to what was said as far back to the days when there was a Temple. When offerings were made, some of these words in the Siddur (where one finds the Amidah) were actually being said, morning, afternoon, and evening. So these words are combined together, blessing God, blessing the time of day, and literally thanking God for where one is in that moment.

    There is little in the way of requests in Jewish prayer. Even when one is sick or one dies, prayer is blessing God, asking that one learns to accept their place in the constant changes of reality, blessing these as they come, etc.

    Those statements about the weather, for example, are merely used to address the changes one sees in the winter as opposed to the summer when they get to that place in the Amidah.

    Why fixed prayers? To learn what we should value, what we should pray for. To be at one with our people, the household of Israel. To ensure that the ideals painfully learned and purified, and for which many have lived and died, shall not perish from the community, and shall have a saving influence upon the individual.--Chaim Stern.
  • Journeyman
    Journeyman

    In fact, Jews do not believe that God actually listens to prayer. He might, but then again God might not. That is not what prayer is about in Judaism.

    [...]
    Instead of believing that one's prayers are being heard by God or one is asking God for something, like Jehovah's Witnesses do, Jews are doing something entirely different. Jews believe they are mostly hearing God talk to them.
    [...]
    There is little in the way of requests in Jewish prayer. Even when one is sick or one dies, prayer is blessing God, asking that one learns to accept their place in the constant changes of reality, blessing these as they come, etc.

    That's fascinating, but if so, that raises questions in my mind.

    Does the evidence indicate that was what Jewish prayer always meant, or was that what it came to mean through human scholarly and rabbinic traditions over the centuries? The indications from many specific prayers recorded in the Hebrew scriptures suggest those giving them often requested something personally and truly believed God would hear them, for example:
    Abraham - "Then Abraham prayed to God, and God healed Abimelek, his wife and his female slaves so they could have children again" (Genesis 20:17)
    David - "Lord, the God of our fathers Abraham, Isaac and Israel, keep these desires and thoughts in the hearts of your people forever, and keep their hearts loyal to you. And give my son Solomon the wholehearted devotion to keep your commands, statutes and decrees and to do everything to build the palatial structure for which I have provided." (1 Chronicles 29:18,19)
    Jacob - "Save me, I pray, from the hand of my brother Esau, for I am afraid he will come and attack me, and also the mothers with their children." (Genesis 32:11)
    Hannah - "In her deep anguish Hannah prayed to the Lord, weeping bitterly. And she made a vow, saying, 'Lord Almighty, if you will only look on your servant’s misery and remember me, and not forget your servant but give her a son, then I will give him to the Lord for all the days of his life, and no razor will ever be used on his head.'" (1 Samuel 1:10,11)

    Some of those verses were mixed in with what your quote calls more fixed prayers which I can understand, but are clearly personal requests or pleadings - for example, David's words in 1 Chronicles.

    On the other hand, if it was always understood to be that way, doesn't that mean that the kind of prayer Jesus taught his followers was radically different? Jesus clearly taught that prayer was intended to include direct personal requests, petitions, hopes, fears and desires, as well as the things you mention (wisdom to accept ones' place, thanksgiving to God, recognise his will, etc), and so was not mainly to be "fixed" in the same sort of way.

  • KalebOutWest
    KalebOutWest

    Journeyman,

    While you may not have realized this, you have actually mixed three different types of prayer and offered them as an example as if there were all the same. This is common for those who come from a Watchtower background.

    Jews, remember, had their religion and culture first, and then the Bible afterwards. This means the worship, rituals and prayers came first and these influenced what you find in the Scriptures, not the other way around. These prayers and rituals are called "liturgy," a formal structure of worship that Jehovah's Witnesses don't have, but other religions do, even other Christians like Catholics, Orthodox Christians, even Protestants like Lutherans and Episopalians and Anglicans.

    The prayers of Jews are litrugical. The prayers in the Hebrew Bible are narratives.

    Then you added the prayers of Jesus. These have nothing to do with Judaism. The instructions of Jesus fly in a total different direction of Jewish prayer at times, and sometimes contradict within themselves. There is some evidence to suggest that some of the instruction on prayer of Jesus comes directly from the Nazareth rabbi, but some of it might come from his followers. I will not cover that here, but the best thing to note is that you cannot mix Jewish with Christian and expect that they are the same thing. They are not.

    Jewish views on prayer has changed over time as Judaism is not a static religion like Christianity. We are not based on the views of a central authority. Christianity cannot move away from its views due to it being based on the teachings of Jesus. Judaism is actually a civilization with a religion in it. The religious views are on a spectrum and evolve over time as the community grows and faces new challenges.

    The Scriptures explain the views on God during various eras including the eras of Moses, the Judges, and the Prophets. The comprehension of God changes during each of these eras from an entity that creates to one that demands sacrifice and fights war to one that has no desire for the blood spilled on altars and wants all people from all nations to pray to Him. God is merely another "character" in the narratives of Scripture in order for people to relate to stories and learn their lessons. The prayers offered are no more genuine than the miracles.

    Is God real? What is God? Is there a personal God? Does God require worship? Does God listen to prayer? What is the real purpose of prayer? Is prayer even necessary? Are there other ways to "pray"? This is what and how Israel worships today. The very word "Israel" means to "wrestle with God."

    Judaism is not filled with answers like the Watchtower religion advertises. It is a means to ask questions, a healthy means to ask. You have to find your own and live with the answers you find. That is what Judaism teaches.

    Christians like definitive answers. Jews do not offer those.

    The search is part of the journey. The journey is part of what it means to be Jewish.

  • peacefulpete
  • peacefulpete
    peacefulpete

    Another interesting parallel is the Jesuine line:

    "And when you are praying, do not use meaningless repetition as the Gentiles do, for they suppose that they will be heard for their many words. And in praying use not vain repetitions, as the Gentiles do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking."

    And : "One that makes his prayer a fixed task, his prayer is no supplication." (Mishnah Brachot 4:4).

    "Be heedful in reciting of the Shema and when you pray make not your prayer a fixed form but plea for mercy." (Pirke Avot 2:13).

    Interestingly, the Jesuine caution seems to parallel the intentionality if the Mishna.

  • KalebOutWest
    KalebOutWest

    Peacefulpete:

    Another interesting parallel is the Jesuine line...

    Interestingly, the Jesuine caution seems to parallel the intentionality if the Mishna.

    I think we might have to thank the Watchtower for a little confusion going on here.

    “Ask and ye shall receive.”--Luke 11:9.

    "You cannot ask God for a parking spot."--My rabbi.

    If you ask any of Jehovah's Witnesses or exJWs to draw a straight line between the two of these, using reason, to make the two meet, they likely could not do so.

    When I wrote that many Jews do not think that God listens to prayer, this might sound odd to the mind of a JW or a former JW. I tend to forget who I am talking to.

    I did not write that "God does not wish to listen to" or "God cannot" or "God will not" or "God is incapable" or anything along those lines.

    When I wrote what I did about why and how Jews prayed, I tried very careful to remind readers that the English word for prayer did not necessarily mean "worship" or "ask." It could include these terms, but only when these specifically addressed these subjects within Jewish t'filah. We are only using the word "prayer," because that is the English word, and we are speaking English here.

    There is a lot to be desired that will escape the mind for Jehovah's Witnesses and exJWs when the subject of Jewish prayer comes up--even Catholic and Protestant prayer--because it is what is known as liturgical prayer.

    Liturgy is something so foreign to the experience of Jehovah's Witnesses that you might us well just die now and be reborn as Buddhist monks who undergo gender reassignment and then became figure skaters for a living who sell hotdogs on street corner during the off-season. Sounds very weird, but that is how different "liturgy" is to the Jehovah's Witness religious experience.

    And yet "liturgical prayer" is so central to Judaism and Christianity, especially first-century Christianity. The liturgy was totally wiped away from the Second Great Awakening as "evil" due to its connection with the Catholic Church, even though its connection goes back to the Jewish Temple.

    The Liturgy is an order, simply put, set to the hours of the day, when the Great Sacrifices would occur upon the Altar, namely Morning, Noon, and Night. The Great Thanksgiving would occur at each, and in fact, the Greek word for this expression is "Eucharist," which is what the prayer for the "Offering of Thanksgiving" for the Bread and Wine during Mass is called. This prayer comes from the Jewish Siddur, the HaMotzi: "Blessed are you, Lord our God, Sovereign of the Universe, who brings forth bread from the earth."

    When the Talmud is describing the recitation of the Shema, it is talking about learning from what you are saying. This is similar to catechesis in Catholic liturgical prayer, such as what occurs when the Apostles' Creed is prayed. Both "prayers" are central to belief within the Liturgy in the services of either faith and yet neither are actually prayers.

    The Shema is:

    Hear O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is One.

    And the Creed is:

    I believe in God,
    the Father almighty,
    Creator of heaven and earth,
    and in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord,
    who was conceived by the Holy Spirit,
    born of the Virgin Mary,
    suffered under Pontius Pilate,
    was crucified, died and was buried;
    he descended into hell;
    on the third day he rose again from the dead;
    he ascended into heaven,
    and is seated at the right hand of God the Father almighty;
    from there he will come to judge the living and the dead.

    I believe in the Holy Spirit,
    the holy catholic Church,
    the communion of saints,
    the forgiveness of sins,
    the resurrection of the body,
    and life everlasting.

    Amen.

    Neither is a "prayer" in the "Watchtower" sense of the word. But they are in the Catholic and Jewish sense. In fact, they are the most important of prayers to these services. While saying the Shema, Jews cover their eyes so they can pay attention to the words (which they say in Hebrew) and pay attention to the words. In Catholicism, they stand erect and face the central crucifix over the altar and say the words in unison.

    The verse from Matthew 6:7, the so-called "Jesuine line" is actually a request to not pray as "the pagans" or "Gentiles." How? Jesus described it as "repetitive" or "babbling." Academics and scholars point to the lists of divine names of deities from different languages transliterated to resemble other tongues to help those who did not speak the native tongue of the deity to hopefully get the pronunciation "just right." It was the hope that by uttering of the many "names" on the list, a petitioner would get at least one of the pronunciations right and somehow get their petition heard. Jesus said such babbling or repetitions were not needed.

    This is similar to the Jewish and Catholic form of prayer today. God is "omnipresent" or merely "is." God doesn't "listen." The prayers of people do not float off into the air or space. These words of "creeds" or the Shema actually instruct the listener. They do not teach God what to believe. That is ridiculous.

    One does not need to utter a divine name, as if they exact use or pronunciation of a name is needed before God would "wake up" and respond. God does not respond to name or come calling like a pet dog or a genie in a bottle. (This is what Mishnah B 4.4 was getting at.) God doesn't respond to the clap of hands or dances for coin. God doesn't "have" to "listen."

    The prayers of Jehovah's Witnesses are based on a different view, namely on a deity that hears and responds, that comes when asked, and the only pays attention if the right name is used, pays attention only to special people, and that gives out party favors, like the Wizard of Oz and the end of the original MGM movie. It's "trick or treat" with Jehovah of the Watchtower.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit