Farkel is great with kids. (and my girls at 15 would have given the big softy at least as much as they got .. they certainly wouldn't have been traumatised by some grumpy ol' coot slinging a few reality bites their way) "old woman" is the thinking type that comes to mind with some of the censorship people here. thanks for cluing me in about your 14 year old Xena (my respect for you and your coments has just risen imeasurably) It's your decsision what your kids see on the nett Xena. People who deem to tell others how to raise thier kids have always rung alarm bells in me. You missed my point Uncle Bruce. I know Farkel is great with kids. I didn't say he wasn't. I happen to like Farkel- I wasn't dissing him. The point I was making is that if a child is posting, it may not be apparant that they are a child and the response they may get may be one that they may not be prepared to handle. Adults on this board need to be thick skinned- it's just the way it is. If this child was so greatly and adversaly affected by what was happening in the chat room, there is no reason for me to expect that she'd be able to handle someone posting actual harshness towards her in a post because they don't know her age. You was kinda dissing Farkel though wasn't ya lol. .. no, i see what you're saying and it makes perfect sense to me .. it always feels uneasy having kids in the chatroom (us degenerates being ewhat we are) but i think the chatroom is a very different thing to the main forum here. From what i've seen in the chatroom, kids have been well protected by responsible adults here There is no fallacy in my claim Uncle Bruce. It's my opinion and I'm entitled to it. The post I linked to was to point out how old she was. I had no problem with that post at all. And I have no problem with the occasional posting by children on this board in the same manner. What I have a problem with is active participation by them in a realm they may not be ready for and as adults I don't believe it's our responsible to walk on eggshells because of their presence. Her post was great !! Big Tex's daughter's post was great !!! THAT is not what I'm talking about here. I'm talking about active involvement in the adult realm of this board and IN MY OPINION that includes being actively involved in the chat room. You infered that this kid was in some kind of danger when that clearly was the opposite of the case. The example you chose was of a girl who had a wonderful time posting there. The only danger she faced was of being love bombed by good caring people. You put up a premise that didn't match your conclusion. In fact the example you chose undermined your whole argument. The post I linked to was to point out how old she was. I had no problem with that post at all. And I have no problem with the occasional posting by children on this board in the same manner. What I have a problem with is active participation by them in a realm they may not be ready for and as adults I don't believe it's our responsible to walk on eggshells because of their presence. Her post was great !! Big Tex's daughter's post was great !!! THAT is not what I'm talking about here. I'm talking about active involvement in the adult realm of this board and IN MY OPINION that includes being actively involved in the chat room. I too am nervous with kids in chat Xena* but are you really trying to protect kids or your own nerves? I am especialy on edge when the little buggers into the room .. but, as in real life, i say "let the children come" unc who sometimes cuts one loose. There are predators on the internet, Uncle Bruce. There are folks who prey on adults on this and other boards. Do you know ALL of the people who post here? |