If an (aggressive) real estate fund is stopping it's operations directly,
and if an publishing house is minimize the portfolio,
and if a member of it's board of directors is telling the costs are higher then the profits,
than we now there must be something going terribly wrong.
So, with the urgent and haste of changing plans in a U-turn, we can conclude that the WTS has:
1) put their assets safe on the Caymans Islands, protecting it for legal reasons (Australia, VS lawsuits).
or
2) have made a terribly mistake with options, high risk investments or theft by one of it's financial advisors.
or
3) did have no clue about their assets and made expansion plans without financial advise, now a emergency stop is made.
So, what do you think, are these reasonable scenarios?
Gorby