PRESIDENTIAL predictions...let the prognosticators have their say!

by Terry 121 Replies latest jw friends

  • liam
    liam
    5 minutes Liam.
    Verifythis.com
    fatcheckafp.com
    checkyourfact.com

    5 Minutes…...Yea, that's about right. Who checks the fact-checkers? Do you know who funds all these fact checkers?

    My Freshman year of College the class was given a Government rumor to check and see if it was fact or fiction. Several kids had the answer in 5 minutes. They all did what you did, use fact checkers. Two days later a lot us Begged the Professor for some more time. He obliged. The Kids that found the answer in 5 minutes were flunked for using internet fact checkers instead of the original source. A couple of years later two of those kids had dropped out and were working at McDonald's.

    Tell me, why didn’t you go to the actual source. The Unites States Department of Defense?

    The reason the majority of people can’t find it is because they don’t know how to research.

    For one thing it’s NOT A LAW…..it’s a DOD Directive. This is the ADMINISTRATIVE STATE under the Biden/Harris Administration. They don’t pass laws, they are a Law to themselves and just take over, by-stepping Congress and the Supreme Court. In other words the Military Itself have given itself authority to kill Americans on American Soil

    Several Congressmen, on X are speaking about it and concerned of a military take over. John Kennedy has also found out and is warning Congress.

    And by the way, everything you said about Kamala and Walz on the other post “Elections and Hypocrisy” reflects that 5 minute research rant.

    Since you only have 5 minutes to do research on important things, here is a copy of the updated document approved by Kathleen H. Hicks, Deputy Secretary of Defense Spend more than 5 minutes reading it.

    https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/524001p.PDF?ver=UpTwJ66AyyBgvy7wFyTGbA%3d%3d

  • WingCommander
    WingCommander

    The military has always had the power to kill civilians. There just had to have Marshall Law enacted. Boom! Any civilian out after curfew, not following direct orders of military personnel, etc.....could be shot on sight.

  • littlerockguy
  • peacefulpete
    peacefulpete
    Tell me, why didn’t you go to the actual source. The Unites States Department of Defense?

    Apparently, you did not bother to read the links. All of them in fact direct readers to the DOD directive. It is discussed in historical context and it's purpose and role.

    “The provisions in DoDD 5240.01 are not new, and do not authorize the Secretary of Defense to use lethal force against U.S. citizens, contrary to rumors and rhetoric circulating on social media,” Sue Gough, a spokesperson for the Department of Defense, told VERIFY.

    "Department of Defense directives are not laws or executive orders – they are policy statements. In other words, these directives can’t make something legal if it isn’t authorized under federal law or by the Constitution." Nunn and Goitein of the Brennan Center for Justice explained.

  • Anony Mous
    Anony Mous

    They are not new but they have changed under Biden allowing them to be a lot more permissive. We already know Biden doesn’t care about the constitutionality of his directives, the cancellation of student debt was declared illegal and unconstitutional and he repeated it twice after the first ruling. This is why people are so cagey, instead of going through Congress despite SCOTUS recently having said that this is unconstitutional when they ruled Chevron deference, he continues making sweeping directives.

  • slimboyfat
    slimboyfat

    Oh, oh it looks like I was WRONG!

    Trump wins !

  • peacefulpete
    peacefulpete
    The overturn of the reasonable and longstanding Chevron deference does not mean agency interpretations of policy is unconstitutional. It means it becomes open to judicial review. Until this is restored every agency policy decision involving science, medicine, military, education and finance can be overruled by activist judges.
  • Anony Mous
    Anony Mous

    @peacefulpete: that is exactly what it is, it is not up to agencies to interpret law, that’s for the judges to overturn and the voters to vote up or down, judges should be involved in limiting the excesses of government, as we have seen with COVID, you cannot trust the government on what they claim to be science. Agencies are part of the executive and execute the law, not make it, they should not have the power to rule on what is science or good financial sense because they are ALWAYS wrong.

    Under the Biden admin, the education and science says that women can be men and men can give birth. Agencies (the executive) cannot overturn the law or re-interpret it, that’s the cornerstone of constitutional democracy.

  • Mickey mouse
    Mickey mouse

    RIP women's rights in The USA.

  • jhine
    jhine

    RIP America .

    So does anyone want to predict how long Trump will last before Vance finds a way to take over ?

    I have a feeling that he is the power behind the throne and Trump has been his puppet.

    Either way a sad day for the world .

    Jan from Tam

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit