Oops. The post didn't show, so i redid it.
If Monogamous Marriage is a Divine Invention
by Satanus 39 Replies latest social current
-
-
Satanus
Further exptrapolation: Adam, the perfect man, had small balls. Solomon needed a servant driven wheel barrel at his disposal Apostle paul didn't have any.
SS
-
Abaddon
... and Jesus?
LOL @ 'Solomon's Wheelbarrow'
-
Satanus
Abaddon
Jesus? It depends. Most christians would swear he didn't do his female groupies. I say he did (if he existed as something similar to the gospel stories).
SS
-
Satanus
Tammy
we were really owe Bill Clinton an apology for jumping all over him for the Lewinsky affair.
I agree.
-
Satanus
On second thought, i may need to retract the solomon's wheel barrel statement. Abaddon's explanation of the need for big balls was to compete w sperm of others. Solomon is likely to have illiminated competition in other ways.
-
funkyderek
Solomon is likely to have illiminated competition in other ways.
He probably had small balls like a gorilla, as he was a dominant male and faced no sexual competition.
-
sandy
LOL at all these comments.
Horses, dogs, cats, deer, coyotes, elk, rabbits.........will screw anything!
You forgot to add men in that statement. -
Francois
OK Abbadon, I get the point now.
I think it's important to include in this equation the fact that before marriage was invented in its primitive form (by women), the sex act was more or less wham, bam and he's outta there for more sperm spreading. This left the woman to raise the resultant child alone. Not good odds for survival way back then with a helpless, exhausted woman and a new helpless infant to take care of.
So the women got together and talked about this revoltin' situation. And they came up with the idea in its primitive state that no, um, "mellon sampling" was going to take place any longer absent a promise from the male type person to hang around and help out with the resultant child. This made the survival rate shoot up through the roof.
Since the women hung out together and were the first priests, they next came up with the idea that they would tell the males that God (in the form of the purple rock in the cave over there with the fire in it) told them to tell the males that not only would there be no mellon sampling absent the promise to stay around, but that the staying around had to last as long as both of them were alive, that mellon sampling absent the promise was a sin (whatever that was) and that mellon sampling was for promise makers only; no single mellon sampling was allowed. And any woman who allowed mellon sampling was killed by her fellow women. And one more thing. The only promise that was any good and which led to mellon sampling was the promise that was extracted by the priestess and in front of her and all the rest of the tribe members, so everyone would know what was what and who was who and WITH whom.
And that's how this entire mess got started in the first place. There is a giant personality gulf between men and women as I feel sure you've noticed. Our job is to spread that sperm far and wide. And the only reason we don't do it is this phoney baloney tale women made up back there in the mists of time. And they ain't talkin' about it. They claim that marriage is of God and, up until the sixties, they seem to have meant it. THANK GOD for the sixties.
That's my story and I'm stickin to it.
-
Swan
I think it's important to include in this equation the fact that before marriage was invented in its primitive form (by women), the sex act was more or less wham, bam and he's outta there for more sperm spreading. This left the woman to raise the resultant child alone. Not good odds for survival way back then with a helpless, exhausted woman and a new helpless infant to take care of.
So basically evolution favored the offspring of males who were loyal to their mates and hung around to help rear the child. That makes sense.
Tammy