For example, in the 1995 Knowledge book, the student is led through a series of plausible-sounding but incorrect arguments (which are disconnected because they're in several chapters) to accepting first that there is such a thing as a composite "faithful slave" class, and then that the JW leadership is that composite slave. The student is not led through a series of arguments proving the existence of a slave class, but is simply told that Matthew 24:45 means what the Society claims. Later, the student is told something like, "Since Jesus said there would be a slave class distributing fine spiritual food, and we're bringing you this food, you need to recognize that our organization is being used by 'the slave' class." By this time, if the student's intellectual alarm bells have not sounded, he simply accepts what he's told and that's that. Thus, I believe that it is only poor reasoning ability, or an emotional need that overrides reasoning ability, or the coercion that parents apply to children, that causes people to accept such lousy 'arguments'
This part is right on the money. That is exactly the way it was in my case.
I did not really understand it. Just accepted it. The person who studied with me told me that I would understand it once I was baptised and Jehovah's spirit was upon me.