Awesome Video on debunking 1914!!!!! Follow it carefully to the end!! (page 15)

Beth Sarim

ahh, I just can't believe the reasoning of some people. When shown indisputable truths.

Mr.Finkelstein

Its partly about ignorance and partly about fear instilled cult mind control Beth .

To go against the espoused information from the WTS is in kind by practicing JWS to go against Jehovah himself and he is about to judge who did and who didn't remained loyal to him via the WTS.

Scholar is a perfect example of that as what can be seen from his posts and comments.

(1 Kings 6:37-38) . . .In the fourth year the house of Jehovah had its foundation laid, in the lunar month of Ziv; 38 and in the eleventh year, in the lunar month of Bul, that is, the eighth month, the house was finished as regards all its details and all its plan; so that he was seven years at building it. . .

(1 Kings 6:1) And it came about in the four hundred and eightieth year after the sons of Israel came out from the land of Egypt, in the fourth year, in the month of Ziv, that is, the second month, after Sol′o‧mon became king over Israel, that he proceeded to build the house to Jehovah.

Beth Sarim

''Its partly about ignorance and partly about fear instilled cult mind control Beth . ''

You show people irrefutable facts and logic. And they can't accept truths. It gets to the point sometimes when you just feel like banging your head against a wall.

scholar

Anna Marina

Again your point? Bul is the eighth lunar month of the sacred calendar of the Israelites corresponding to the second month of the secular calendar. 1 Kings 6:37-38

scholar JW

scholar

johnamos

Based on them saying 625 is his 4th year and the Scripture saying he reigned for 11 years…what years do you say are the correct years:

629-618 or 628- 617?

This is not a trick question, whatever one you say we will use it as our foundation

Neither. Jehoiakim reigned for about 11 years from 628-618 BCE and this is the best one can hope for.

scholar JW

scholar

Mr. Finkelstein

Your last encyclopedic post is a mixture of the GOOD, BAD and UGLY !!!!!!!!!!

scholar JW

scholar

Beth Sarim

When shown indisputable truths. Please explain the indisputable truth for a precise date for the Fall, is it 586 or 587 BCE ?

scholar JW

Mr.Finkelstein

Nevertheless the intent is to show all relevant information in a honest and truthful manner, something that's not there in the WTS's expressed doctrines or literature.

Archeological findings have supported the bible's own writings and occurring events, so from both sources we can conclusively conclude that Jerusalem's destruction did not occur in 607 BCE .

Why that came about by the WTS is because they wanted to create their own history which supported their own doctrines and to further their literature proliferation agenda. ( ie 1914 )

That's why I call them apostate charlatans.

scholar

Mr. Finkelstein

Archeological findings have supported the bible's own writings and occurring events, so from both sources we can conclusively conclude that Jerusalem's destruction did not occur in 607 BCE

--

You express such dogmatism so my question to you is this: You claim that we can conclusively prove that Jerusalem's destruction did not occur in 607 BCE then what date for Jerusalem's destruction can you conclusively prove?

scholar JW

Awesome Video on debunking 1914!!!!! Follow it carefully to the end!!

Share this