Troublesome Trinity Verses Part 3

by hooberus 43 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • PRB
    PRB

    LittleToe,

    Well I think I've made a satisfactory attempt to answer all prior questions. I could persue this further, but I will certainly NOT be successful at changing the mind of anyone who is convinced of the TRINITY. I would say what other Trinitarians have said to me in the past, 'these are things that the Lord will clarify in his day'.

    As for those who have lingering questions, please weigh everything carefully against countless number of scriptural references that show that the Son and the Father are not the same. Here are a few of these scriptural references:

    Jesus is spoken of as being the Mediator between God and men... 1 Tim. 2:5.

    Jesus is spoken of as being distinct from the Father... John 8:17, 18.

    God is spoken of as the head of Christ... 1 Cor. 11:3.

    Jesus spoke of the Father as being God rather than himself... John 17:3.

    A voice from Heaven separate and apart from Jesus speaks of him as being His 'beloved Son'... Matt 3:17.

    If Christ is represented as a Priest, he cannot be God... Heb. 3:1.

    I could go on and on..., but I'm sure you wouldn't want me to.

    Trinitarians have countless number of unanswered scriptures which contradict their position that Jesus and the Holy Spirit are God.

  • LittleToe
    LittleToe

    PRB:

    I will certainly NOT be successful at changing the mind of anyone who is convinced of the TRINITY

    Maybe that's the problem, here.
    I'm not trying to change your mind, I'm just inquiring as to how you are interpreting scripture.

    Trinitarians have countless number of unanswered scriptures which contradict their position that Jesus and the Holy Spirit are God.

    And the converse is true of the Unitarian position

  • PRB
    PRB

    Little Toe,

    It wasn’t my expectation to change the beliefs of anyone on this forum. It was my hope to provide a defense for what I believe the Bible says on this subject. I’m bowing out of further discussion because I believe this topic will quickly become a cyclic exchange of accusations and counter accusations while ignoring any scriptural references.

    Well Little Toe, would you have been depressed or terribly bent out of shape if after reviewing these scriptures and your reasoning, I concluded the following:

    You know, you guys are right. All these years I’ve been misleading myself. Jesus is God!

    You may not have been trying to change my mind, but I doubt that the above response would have ruined your day either.

  • LittleToe
    LittleToe

    Dude, regardless of your beliefs, I accept you anyway.

    If you hold Christ as dear, and it appears you do, all the better.

    As for accusations, I have no time for them. I've thoroughly enjoyed discussing this topic with you.
    Thank you.

  • PRB
    PRB

    Peace.

  • LittleToe
    LittleToe

    Peace to you, too.

    Btw, we agree on the following:

    The Son and the Father are not the same
    Jesus is spoken of as being the Mediator between God and men
    Jesus is spoken of as being distinct from the Father
    God is spoken of as the head of Christ
    A voice from Heaven separate and apart from Jesus speaks of him as being His 'beloved Son'

    However, the belief that "the Father" IS "the Son" would be Oneness Trinitarianism, which most of the Christian world doesn't believe in, either (including myself).

  • hooberus
    hooberus
    PRB said: hooberus,

    Thanks for your comments. However, it really takes a tremendous logical leap to equate Jesus with Jehovah after quoting all the scriptures you made reference to.

    Here are the scriptues again: In what sense is the Father God?

    "For the LORD your God is God of gods, and Lord of lords, a great God, a mighty, and a terrible, which regardeth not persons, nor taketh reward:" Deuteronomy 10:17

    "O give thanks unto the LORD; for he is good: for his mercy endureth for ever. O give thanks unto the God of gods: for his mercy endureth for ever. O give thanks to the Lord of lords: for his mercy endureth for ever." Psalm 136: 1-3

    "For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,) But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him." 1 Corinthians 8:5-6

    The Father since he is "God of gods" (Deuteronomy 10:17 Psalm 136:1-3) and the "one God" as contrasted with the "gods many" (1 Corinthians 8:5-6) must be the true God Jehovah.

    In what sense is the the Son Lord? "That thou keep this commandment without spot, unrebukeable, until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ: Which in his times he shall shew, who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords;" 1 Timothy 6:14-15 "For the LORD your God is God of gods, and Lord of lords, a great God, a mighty, and a terrible, which regardeth not persons, nor taketh reward:" Deuteronomy 10:17

    "O give thanks unto the LORD; for he is good: for his mercy endureth for ever. O give thanks unto the God of gods: for his mercy endureth for ever. O give thanks to the Lord of lords: for his mercy endureth for ever." Psalm 136: 1-3

    "For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,) But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him." 1 Corinthians 8:5-6

    The Son since he is "Lord of lords" (Deuteronomy 10:17 Psalm 136:1-3) and the "one Lord" as contrasted with the "lords many" (1 Corinthians 8:5-6) must be the true Lord Jehovah.

    1 Corinthians 8:5-6 is clearly making a distinction between Jesus and Jehovah.

    1 Corintians 8:5-6 is not making a disctiction between Jesus and Jehovah (which does not appear in the New Testament). 1 Corinthians 8:5-6 is primarily making a distinction between the "gods many" / "lords many" with the one God and one Lord. The is also a disctiction made between the Father and the Son. However both are Jehovah.

    The Father and the Son are addressed in completely separate references in verse 6.

    The Trinty teaches that the Father and the Son are separate persons within the Godhead, hense them shown to be distinct from one another is according to Trinitarian theology. The fact that there seems to be a distinction between the "one God the Father" and Jesus Christ does not mean that He is not also God any more than the fact that the Father is shown to be distinct from the "one Lord Jesus Christ" means that He is not also Lord. As one of David Reed's books says: "There is but one God," says Jehovah's Witness in applyling this verse, "and who is he? The Father! So, Jesus is not God." However, there is a flaw in his line of reasoning. Don't let him stop there; make him apply the same line of reasoning to the rest of the verse. Then he will have to say, "There is but one Lord, and who is he? Jesus Christ! So, the Father is not Lord." Of course, the JW does not want to reach this conclusion, because he always speaks of Jehovah as 'Lord." Point out to him that he cannot have the one without the other. He cannot make the first half of the verse exclude Jesus fron being God, without making the second half exclude the Father from being Lord. The fact is that scripture uses the terms God and Lord virtually interchangeably. The various false gods are called both "gods" and "lords." The Father is called both "God" and "Lord," and the Son is referred to by both terms. The apostle Thomas addressed Jesus as "my Lord and my God" (John 20:28). Watchtower leaders have taught their disciples to see 1 Corinthians 8:6 in a contrast that does not exist. Jehovah's Witnesses Answered Verse by Verse p. 96

    You also made reference to Psalms 136:1-3 where Jehovah is referred to as both "God of gods" and "Lord of lords". By using this reference, you are obviously trying to tie it to Jesus being "Lord of lords" (see Rev. 17:14 and Rev. 19:16).

    Yes, because the verses are so similar. They make a good match for compariso

    When considering the reference to Jesus as “Lord of lords”, you have to remember how he got to that position. Jehovah God (his Heavenly Father) granted him the elevated position of “Lord of lords” (Mt. 28:18, Mt. 11:27, Eph. 1:20-22, Php. 2:9,10).

    None of these verses say that Jesus was elevated to the postition of being "Lord of lords" The verses you listed talk about Jesus receiving "All things" and "all authority" from the Father. I don't think that this shows that Jesus was not "Lord of lords" until these times. We know that he was the creator of "all things" and that He was the "Lord" of the Old Testament.

    Even though Jesus is referred to as “Lord of lords” in Relations 17:14 and 19:16, there is no reference to Jesus being “God of gods”.

    There is also no reference to the Father being "God of gods" in the New Testamant does this mean that He is not then "God of gods"? Of course not. We know that the Father is the God of gods mentioned in the Old Testament because the New Testament says that He is God. Just like we know that Jesus is the "God of gods" of the Old Testament because the New testament says that He is God. Interestingly the New Testament never refers to the Father as "Lord of lords" (though I believe that He is). The New Testamant applys this phrase to Jesus Christ, hense Jesus Christ is the "Lord of lords" of the Old Testament.

    You can look to Ephesians 1:21 which provides more light as to how Jesus is “Lord of lords”.

    "And what is the exceeding greatness of his power to usward who believe, according to the working of his mighty power, Which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places, Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come: And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church, " Ephesians 1:19-22 Ephesians Chapter 1:19-23 is talking about the postional nature of the resurrected man Jesus Christ, not him becoming "Lord of lords" "And what is the exceeding greatness of his power to usward who believe, according to the working of his mighty power, Which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places," Ephesians 1:19-20 "Let thy hand be upon the man of thy right hand, upon the son of man whom thou madest strong for thyself." Psalm 80:17 "Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come: And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church," Ephesians 1:21-22 "What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him? For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour. Thou madest him to have dominion over the works of thy hands; thou hast put all things under his feet: Psalm 8:4-6 Though as a man he was elevated postionally above all these things, I don't believe that this is when he became "Lord of lords" Before the time of his exaltation (Ephesians 1:19-22) as a man above these things, Jesus was already above them because he was their creator: "And what is the exceeding greatness of his power to usward who believe, according to the working of his mighty power, Which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places, Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come: And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church," Ephesians 1:19-22 "For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence." Colossians 1:16-18

    In Matthew 28:18, Jesus acknowledged that authority had been granted to him. Therefore, Jesus would not be Lord of lords if the Father had not granted him that position.

    I'll deal more (Lord willing) with Matthew 28:18 on another thread.

  • PRB
    PRB

    Hooberus, Deputy Dog, Little Toe:

    It sounds like we agree about much more than we think.

    I believe that based on our discussion and your reasoning skills, that you folks would make excellent Unitarians!

  • LittleToe
    LittleToe

    And you, my friend, might make an excellent Trinitarian, albeit maybe at the more fundamentalist end of the spectrum.

    (Just yanking ya chain )

    In Peace...

  • hooberus
    hooberus

    Now back to the subject of this thread:

    PRB said: Using these scripture references to support the Trinity is a weak attempt at best. First, you have to look at everything in context. Use Deuteronomy 10:17 for example. The name of God YHWH is used in that same verse when showing that Jehovah is Mighty. The one verse in the Bible where the title "Mighty God" is used for Jesus does not include YHWH to identify him.

    Correct, however Jesus is identified as the YHWH of Isaiah in other verses. "In the year that king Uzziah died I saw also the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up, and his train filled the temple. Above it stood the seraphims: each one had six wings; with twain he covered his face, and with twain he covered his feet, and with twain he did fly. And one cried unto another, and said, Holy, holy, holy, is the LORD of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory. And the posts of the door moved at the voice of him that cried, and the house was filled with smoke. Then said I, Woe is me! for I am undone; because I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips: for mine eyes have seen the King, the LORD of hosts." Isaiah 6:1-5 (compare John 12:41) "Sanctify the LORD of hosts himself; and let him be your fear, and let him be your dread. And he shall be for a sanctuary; but for a stone of stumbling and for a rock of offence to both the houses of Israel, for a gin and for a snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem." Isaiah 8:13-14 (compare with 1 Peter 2:8) Since Jesus is the YHWH of Isaiah and since He is called "Mighty God" a phrase which is applied exclusively to YHWH in the rest of the Old Testament it stands that Jesus is YHWH.

    Notice also that the words when used in reference to Jesus state 'and he shall be called... Mighty God'. These words did not state that 'He is Mighty God', instead they say 'and he shall be called'. Those words were used to attribute titles to the Son of God. So, it is clear when you look at these examples in their proper context, that two different people are being referred to here.

    The phrase "Mighty God" is used in a future sense to show that even after the Messiah is born as a human, that He is also to be called God. This refutes the claims of those who like the watchtower teach that Jesus was only a man after he was born.

    Those verses are not troublesome at all unless you go though the trouble and logical acrobatics to use them while trying to prove this most ambiguous of doctrines.

    Actually this thread was started as a response to unitarians using this verse to try to make Jesus something less than God by saying that phrase "Mighty God" means that Jesus was a lesser God than YHWH.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit