@hoser:
I agree a combination of things is likely to happen. Prices could adjust up, or employment can adjust down, or both. In most minimum wage hikes, I think it’s some combination.
But the point of proposing a massive hike, to say $1,000,000/hr, is to force those in favor of a minimum wage to acknowledge the effects beneath the surface. It is not the case that law makers establish or raise a minimum wage, and the only thing effects are wonderful.
If you require a minimum wage of $1,000,000/hr, and the business didn’t shutter its doors immediately, then prices would have to go up. Firing all the employees and retaining just one wouldn’t cover the losses. If all employees are retained, then prices would have to rise even more. Of course, if automation can help, that might come into play over time too. Employment would fall from it. But it wouldn’t be cheap. After all, some entrepreneur would have front the capital, the risk, and employee people at the higher rate too. So even simple machines would cost millions.
Not to mention input costs along the supply chain of everything, just for raw materials.
At this point, the superficial boon from the minimum wage vanishes. The poor have millions of dollars, but are still poor.
These effects are still there, but to a lesser extent, with small hikes. With small hikes, employers do the math and might think: “Well, if I have to pay $15/hr then I would rather take the college student then the uneducated guy just out of high school...” So over time the demographics of employees shift, and prices might go up a little. The port have to pay the higher prices, but with less jobs.
It is just a mess.