Instead we were told that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and was an "imminent" threat to the USA and the free world.
Gopher, I thought the UN was the one who said that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Wasn't Saddaam refusing to account for them? That's the way I remember it.
As far as your "imminent" threat quote, this came up on a talk show the other day and the person was unable to find the quote. I certainly don't remember it.
I did find this though on townhall.com
'Imminent threat' is revisionist spin
Jonah Goldberg (archive)
October 17, 2003 | Print | Send
Jimmy Carter never used the word "malaise" in his "malaise speech." Abraham Lincoln never said, "God must have loved the common people, he made so many of them."
And George W. Bush never said that the threat from Iraq was "imminent."
He never said it. Seriously. Not once.
Teams of rhetoric inspectors have been pouring over Bush's comments, utterances, speeches and gesticulations for about as long as we've been looking for WMD in Iraq and, to date, nobody has found a shred of proof that the president - or anybody in his Cabinet - ever once said Iraq or Saddam Hussein posed an "imminent" threat to the United States.
In fact, one of the only good finds on this score actually says the complete opposite. In President Bush's State of the Union Address last January, he said:
"Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too late."
This is important because the favorite talking point of Democrats and liberal pundits right now is that the president "lied" when he said that Iraq posed an "imminent threat."
Yerusalim,
Thanks for posting this. I'll be interested in the report as well. I have a question for you. Remember the terorist training camp with the jet passenger plane photographed in Iraq? What ever happened to that story? Was it not what it appeared to be?
Just curioous if you know anything about it.
Perry