The arrogance of writing the academic credentials after a signature when a letter or posted materials are not of professional quality makes those credentials look foolish. - Faraon, 18-Jan-04 16:24 GMT
Agreed.
His scholarship, as he is the one who constantly alludes to it ( even having the on-line handle ?Scholar? ) is part of the strategy he uses to defend WTS chronology and as such is fair game in an on-line debate. - hillary_step, 18-Jan-04 16:56 GMT
Agreed. And I do wonder just who "scholar" thinks will be impressed with academic credentials. As has been previously noted, it simply gives an impression of arrogance and insecurity. A year ago "scholar" spoke of being new to computer use so doubtless time will see improvement in many respects.
The simple reason why I do not elaborate in detail all that could be said is simply that I am rather new to computer use and do not enjoy at this stage the abilities in making impressive posts as others do. - scholar, So, where DID the 1914 timeline go awry? thread, 16-Jan-03 06:23 GMTEarnest