#1: You are suffering THE GUILT TRIP game, in spades...
If they can’t answer your questions, just keep asking them. That’s what they do when you are 1st approached: pretend to have the ultimate answer for everything. Some of the answers are a fast-shuffle shell game and meant to "obfuscate" or cloud the issue. All items are repeated, ad nauseum; the result is that you are INDOCTRINATED.
JUST KEEP ASKING AND PUSH THE GUILT TRIP BACK ONTO THEM: IF YOU CAN’T ANSWER ME, THEN YOU (the JW) HAVE THE PROBLEM, NOT ME.
#2: "I can't help but feel this teaching of children going through Armagedon only if parents do what's right is similar to the Catholics teaching of hell-fire. All I know for sure, is that it's keeping me awake at night."
Curious indeed, Captain
I was doing some research on Baptism recently and had occasion to collect a number of Baptismal Vows to contrast with the JW Vows. I found something that I never knew and we were never told as a JW:
Yes, the Catholics believe in Infant Baptism. BUT!!!: some responsible adult relative or guardian speaks up for the child. Later, in early teens, usually, the child has to speak for themselves and affirm the Infant Baptism. The thought being that they are now "of an age to make a decision" or some such. This is known as CONFIRMATION.
I can see only a minor difference in technique, here, now that I have actually read the Catholic, Lutheran, Presbyterian and a dozen other sets of Baptismal Vows in a "comparative anatomy" mode. (Your reading those "pagan vows" isn't going to happen in JW study.)
BTW, this was not the matter I was looking for in the research; I actually stumbled on this massive oversight.
In comparison, JW parents must "maintain proper conduct and be in good standing" in an arrangement that is informal and unacknowledged to save their underage and unaware children; Catholic parents formally Baptize the infant and stand up for the child’s salvation in a similar manner.
Both situations require that the child personally face the situation when they become of an "accountable age".
The effective difference is one ceremony versus two. I have never seen or heard of this being discussed in JW rhetoric.
Mustang