I think this is smoke and mirrors to fool the public into believing that "something is being done" by an administration that didn't do enough when it should have.
How will this improve security? Really? Didn't the Sep 11 hijackers have visa's?
"Sir, hijackers have flown planes into sky-scrapers!" ... "it's ok, we have their fingerprints and a picture".
Wow.
What is needed is proper intelligence and not the make believe hi-tech intelligence that has been relied on so far that makes money for some companies but doesn't deliver. You need contacts on the ground who know what's going on. Hell, the US doesn't even have enough translators to listen in on things, never mind people who have a clue.
Flying spyplanes and launching satellites is all very well but it tells you nothing of what is really happening. There is no point gearing up for the "big war" with anti-missile defense systems and the like when the threat is a guy from the sticks with a rucksack on a bus.
On this scale, alienation of people is exactly the opposite of what you need. You want to have people wanting to come forward with information and not being estranged.
If the debarcle over WoMD and Iraq has taught us anything it's that the current "military intelligence" (surely and oxymoron) is inadequate as it couldn't even verify the information that was being collected and means that our countries are open to being used by people feeding misinformation OR the processes are not transparent enough that people can decide policy based on what they want to do rather than what the truth is and what is needed.