I believe in non-violence. That said, if the United States were taken over by a foreign power, I would hope that we would have the courage and guts to fight it out like the resistance in Iraq is doing.
But the United States would not exist... because we/it (the United States) illegally occupied Indian land and repressed them. Would you like me to contact the Pawnee, Sioux, Comanche and all the other Indian Nations to continue the fight they stopped a century ago? If not, why not? I'm sure the young braves of today would just LOVE to learn to scalp just like their great grandfathers did before them.
"USA out of everywhere!" That's what the anti-war/peace activists say. Well... practice what you preach and DO IT! You are occupying sovereign Indian land. Get Out! **dawns feather covered headress**
"Resistance in Iraq"? Who are they? Do you know for a fact who they are (just like you claim you know for a fact Bush is lining his pockets from this). Provide your evidence of these "freedom fighters".
Do you know of Human Rights? Do you believe in upholding them? When someone is harming another, do you stop them? Do borders prevent help from being allowed to gain access to the needy? Or do you just sit back and watch?
Sure the USA has killed civilians in Iraq through accidental confrontation/collaterial damage. Every war it happens. But if THAT was the reason (innocent civilians accidentally being killed by Coallition military) these foreign "freedom/resistance fighters" are entering Iraq, why did they not enter the country and target Saddam & The Gang for purposefully killing innocent civilians? Coalition accidentally kills small number of civilians - BAD... Saddam a fellow Muslim, purposefully kills many civilians - GOOD! This is not resistance. It's fanatics wanting their 72 virgins.
I would hope that we would have the courage and guts to fight it out like the resistance in Iraq is doing. I don't think they are heroes, but they are doing what you are SUPPOSED to do when your country is attacked and occupied and under repression.
And the colonial army burned, dismembered and mutilated foreign civilians instead of their enemy. And the colonial army beheaded foreign civilans instead of their enemy. And the colonial army mass-murdered civilians in another country friendly to the enemy in order to trick/get the enemy to leave. And the colonial army used local and foreign civilians as shields against their will. And the colonial army took local and foreign civilians hostage and started making demands and threatened to kill them, if their enemy did not leave. And the colonial army strapped their's and others pregnant women with explosives and had them run up to the enemy. And the colonial army threatened and killed civilians who didn't support the resistance. And the colonial army used Ben Franklin while in France, to sail a boat full of explosives to England and ignite said explosives once it was placed next to a boat ferrying British school children to another port in England.
{sarcasm}What an excellent book of acceptable warfare you just wrote!{/sarcasm}
Yeah... "you don't think" is an understatement.
I will ask again, what about Bosnia and Kosovo? What about what France is doing in the Congo?