USING CONTEXT to understand 'supernatural' Jesus (page 5)

Viviane

This is what I have done myself. Which is why the factual statements made in these threads by me are assured. I.e, viv apparently didn't grasp that saying Yeshua ben Yosef is his actual name

Wow. Proclaiming yourself and proclamations to be assured if the first sign of delusional grandeur. Fortunately, we have a record of this most recent episode of duplicity on your behalf. For your benefit,I will quote me quoting you: We are not discussing what Jesus name was as part of his community, we were discussing, and I'll quote you here, "The referrence to him as the son of Mary". If you want to discuss what his name would have been, that's fine and it's great, but it's an entirely different conversation. As I have shown, he WAS referred to as "son of Joseph" if you want to get into nameing, but, according to you, we are discussing a reference to him, not what his name would have been.

You never said anything about his NAME until you needed to change the subject. If it is delusions of grandeur that prevent you from acknowledging your own words, see a doctor. If it's simply an inability to be wrong because of some belief system, well, you've been caught lying.

The surety in responses to my unchangable facts is, indeed, very repugnant to me.

That sucks for you, eh?

Pistoff

"Also I direct this to you again Viv, failure to comply will be viewed as discrediting your comments going forward:"

You are not as knowledgeable as you think you are, and appear to be a bit of a would be bully.

Viviane

luck would be on your side Terry.
most of these 41,000 divisions are along the lines of tradition, governance, and organization. In fact, as far as the truth being taught most of the 41,000 are theologically identical.

That presupposes those divisions, no matter how tiny, aren't important or that the divisions are all about tradition and organizations or than Christianity is true or that any of those 41000 denominations are right.

Viviane

You are not as knowledgeable as you think you are, and appear to be a bit of a would be bully.

Yeah, that's hilarious. "Failure to comply" wrapped with personal insults and constant threats to leave in a huff only to come back with more threats of failure to comply with insults and more threats to leave. It's quite comical watching JD attempt to distort research, what the Bible says and his own words (while declaring his words to be assured) in an attempt to justify his belief system.

Apparently "not backing down" is now being a bully. Boo hoo!

myelaine

"That presupposes..."

yup :)

xo

Viviane

yup
xo

Well, at least you know you're making stuff up and not hiding it.

Jonathan Drake

"Also I direct this to you again Viv, failure to comply will be viewed as discrediting your comments going forward:"

You are not as knowledgeable as you think you are, and appear to be a bit of a would be bully.

Not so, if you review all of Viv's comments you will find this individual to be a disrespectful, argumentative, insulting person. I only responded in kind, I did not invite it.

Viviane

Not so, if you review all of Viv's comments you will find this individual to be a disrespectful, argumentative, insulting person. I only responded in kind, I did not invite it.

Look out, we're having a pity party over here.

Jonathan Drake

Viv I don't know if you realize you're doing it, but you are a destructive, negative presence here. I have no problem with people with different opinions and beliefs. But I do have a problem with any who attempt to force that opinion or belief on me.

In both of the threads in which you have responded to me, you positioned so called facts. Some of which I'd concede can be argued, such as el and Yahweh. But you were proven wrong on other subjects and it didn't even register to you, you ignored it and continued to harrass me and instigate an argument rather than have a civil discussion.

I spent about 5 minutes reviewing your treatment of others besides myself, and found you're behavior is a pattern. You're a destructive force here that always seems to end up in an argument because of how you address others. I have flagged all the posts in which you were being instigative and harassing for the sake of it, rather than for any real discussion.

I do apologize however, for the few snide remarks I did make toward you. No matter how you addressed me, I should have remained completely civil. Having said that, I sincerely hope your behavior is reviewed by an admin. I also invite any who read this to review both this thread entirely and this before passing judgment:

http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/66690001/exactly-what-historic-view-divine-what-being-god-meant-long-ago

Simon

Viviane: please stop with the insults / non-constructive comments and stick to the topic.

USING CONTEXT to understand 'supernatural' Jesus

Share this