Okay everybody! I think this one is big. In the original post to this thread by Farkel, we read:
Berta met Bonnie Boyd sometime in the early 1930's. This was confirmed by her niece, "larc's" mother. It was also confirmed in the Olin Moyle trial transcript on pages 1299-1301. At the time, Berta was a full time pioneer and a member of the "anointed." During this time she traveled to Europe with Bonnie Boyd to attend a European convention of Jehovah's Witnesses.
Well, I may well have found empirical proof of this....I was just searching ship passenger logs and came across the following list of the passengers of the S. S. Normandie sailing from Le Havre, France on August 25, 1937:
Here we have Bonnie Boyd, Berta Peale, and William Heath all travelling together with Joseph Rutherford on the same vessel, returning from a trip to Europe. Note ESPECIALLY that this was before 1938 when Berta divorced her husband and moved to Bethel. Here she is still married and still residing in Cuyagen Falls, Ohio. This is also before Bonnie Boyd and William Heath got married. Unfortunately, this list from the S. S. Normandie does not specify cabin numbers, so we cannot tell who roomed with whom.
But here is the most disconcerting thing: Now we have SPECIFIC info on Bonnie Boyd's background, and she says that she was born on July 17, 1904 in Waterloo, Iowa. This is contrary to the information given in the 1930 census, wherein she gave her age as 31 years old. That pointed to 1899 or so as her year of birth. This age is stated on BOTH entries for her in the 1930 census, the one taken at Beth Sarim and the other one taken at Bethel. Here is the one at Bethel:
So what in the world is going on here? Is Bonnie lying about her age in one of these? Note also the comment that Farkel made in his original post: "Yet Boyd came to Bethel as a GIRL in the Fall of 1923 with her mother and Rutherford died in 1942, nineteen years later. A few weeks after Rutherford's death, the San Diego Union on February 18, 1942 quoted her as saying she was the "adopted daughter" of Judge Rutherford, and had been with him continuously since she was 16." This had always bothered me....if Bonnie Boyd was born around 1899 as she said she was, then she would have been 16 years old in 1915....long before she supposedly went to Bethel in 1923. But if she were instead born in 1904, then she would have turned 16 in 1920...a date much closer to Farkel's 1923. Now it is interesting that earlier on, in 1930, Bonnie claimed to be older than she claimed to be in 1937. Could this mean that when she first went to Bethel and for some time afterward, Bonnie concealed her young age and claimed to have been older than she really was? And then later, when she was travelling internationally and had to use her federal passport, she was more honest about her actual age?
Well, I have to say that Bonnie's duplicity has been rather frustrating for me trying to track down more details about her history, but perhaps it has revealed something about her that we have not already known. Now that we know she possibly was born as much as five years later than she had claimed, this means I have to go back to the drawing board to figure out who her family was. At least now I know her birthday and the town she was born in.