Ross:
I edited my last post before I could read your answer. You might have another look at it -- not that it should convince you, but I tried to explain my view a little more clearly (?).
by LittleToe 65 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
Ross:
I edited my last post before I could read your answer. You might have another look at it -- not that it should convince you, but I tried to explain my view a little more clearly (?).
Didier:
Thanks for that. I'd like to explore your concept of this, if I may.
Going extra-literary, for a moment:
Going back to the biblical sources again, would you say that the "believer" is tri-part, once the Holy Spirit dwells within?
would you say that the "believer" is tri-part, once the Holy Spirit dwells within?
When I left da lowd....me became a duo-part. I was found then lost, instead a lost and found. Me always git stuff backwards. Now alls I have is a mind and soul....but no's spirit. That's why me has bags under his eyes...no spirit. Tain't no casket can hold da spirit if'n ye gots one.
*Starts talkin in some ancient jewish tongue*
Gumby
Gumby:
Bl**dy Arminians.
If you'd only gone to a good Calvinist church you'd have known it doesn't evaporate.
It's like when you get grease on yer sweater - all ya can do is spread it around a bit...
Ross,
Little Talia is on my mind tonight. I didn't feel like posting, but I remembered your questions and thought I might as well try to answer.
"Going extra-literary" I can't go very far.
I love the history of ideas and beliefs, but what am I left with aside the literary realm? Strictly nothing.
"Realistically" I can't think of a "God", of a "God-man", of a "soul", of a "spirit" anymore. This has become meaningless to me.
Yet, by emptying themselves of any "real" meaning, all those words become available to me as metaphors -- metaphors for what?
I don't know: perhaps this strange feeling of connection I sometimes experienced -- or invented -- with other people and potentially with everyone and everything, past, present and future... should I call that "spirit"? Metaphorically I would.
I am what I am, a fortuitous and provisional combination of genes, language and culture, with a beginning and an end. My "self" is dependent on my "body" as it is on my being a biological "individual". No real "soul" will carry it anywhere beyond my death, and I think it's all right. Yet what I am made of was before me and will go on further, unperceptibly changed by "me" as by every other "being". I like the idea of the "soul" as a generally quiet and forgotten "double" (some would say "the child in me") which sometimes weeps when I laugh, or revolts when I give up -- or just the opposite. There doesn't exist such a "thing" within me (even if I call it "the unconscious", it is still not "something"). But metaphorically I can't think of a better word to express it -- or to invent it.
From this admittedly unorthodox perspective, I look back on the history of thought and I do find concepts more or less interesting. I'm not attracted to the doctrine of the "tri-part man" because I like to think of my (metaphorical) "soul" as mine and of the (metaphorical) "spirit" as beyond any self (metaphorically "divine"). One is on the path of intro-spection, the other is on the opposite path of ek-stasis -- although the twain can meet sometimes. I do find the Trinity doctrine beautiful, especially in its Greek versions, much deeper in any case than Unitarism. But I also find other heretical (Gnostic, for instance) or non-Christian doctrines equally fascinating. Whatever, this is only an aesthetical, subjective, appreciation of a myth (very positive word in my book) and its ability to inspire me in forming and re-forming my own imagination.
Well... largely off-topic and pretty confuse, but you asked for it.
Didier:
Well... largely off-topic and pretty confuse, but you asked for it.
On the contrary, I loved it. Thank you!