In a word... Yes.
A book you might want to look at is Fingerprints Of The Gods by Graham Hancock... Great book.
Why I say the Bible is wrong is for many reasons, one is because the Great Pyramids and most of the unexplainable stuff on the Giza plateau were built much earlier than conventional history would have us believe, there is geological evidence to prove this on certain monuments... Meaning that there were men carving and building massive structures from natural rock 15,000 years ago... I ranted on a similer subject a few days ago as pasted below...
I would also add that there have been discussions on this forum in the past on the impossibility of our species rebounding at the rate it supposedly did, from 5 people to however many hundreds of thousands or millions when first census was taken (I don't know the figures but it is impossible)...
Also do you think a physical Ark of the dimensions Noah's Ark supposedly was, could fit hundreds of millions of species in it? Remember we are talking literally hundreds of millions of species. I think not.
If you really have interest in this subject check the book out I mentioned.
My view tends towards that of authors Charles Hapgood, Graham Hancock, Robert Bauval, Rand Flem Ath etc. That at a point in history the Antarctic was closer to the equator and richly inhabited by intelligent human and animal life, as a continent it would have all the things required for an advanced maritine civilisation to develop (and flourish), the fact that there are maps from the 1500's copied from older maps which clearly detail the Antartic as two islands (as well as mapping many other things around the world which we did not 'rediscover' until recently), with modern day accuracy and understanding of the precessional cycle, longitude & lattitude etc. In my mind there is no doubt that there was a highly advanced and highly human civilisation at some point in our pre history. The theory of Charles Hapgood is that the earth's crust displaces every x number of years, (meaning that the outer skin of the earth rotates around the centre on the molten rock cushion in between) thus thrusting continents previously in warm climates into the freezing cold & vice versa, and explaining why an ice age happens... Perhaps not that an ice age happens everywhere at once, but that it happens in one point all of the time. The south pole is constantly in an ice age, it's just that if the earths crust moves, then the land mass under the south pole changes, and coveres land which was previously close to the equator with a sheet of ice.
The very fact that ancient maps exist showing the Antarctic as two islands (a fact only recently discovered by 21st century man) is testimony to someone knowing and someone having charted this fact at some point in the past, the reason there is no 'evidence' in the antarctic is because it is burried under 2 miles of ice, this being said though, the unexplained evidence left scattered around the world is pretty compelling.
To sum the whole ice sheet thing up, which makes more sense... The ice sheets are x many millions of years old and so the map makers who charted the Antarctic when it was two islands must have done so x many millions of years ago, or someone guessed the whole shape of the world with modern day accuracy and mapped things like coastlines and the amazon river, OR the ice sheets are just not as old as we think they are and someone mapped them say, 15,000 years ago... Bear in mind there are maps in existence (copied from older maps) which show the Antarctic as being only partly covered by ice, meaning that it was not and cannot have been so heavily covered with ice for as long as contemporary science would have us believe.
As to whether this civilisation had planes or aircraft as we do... I've no idea, but it's more than fair to say that they had as good an understanding of the universe, the precessional cycle, mathematics, longitude/lattitde as I said, that we do now, things that we only recently learned were known way back many thousands of years. It's a fact that there copies of ancient maps, mapping out things which we only recently found. It is also fact that the megalithic and undated stone monuments (undated because you cannot carbon 14 date natural stone) around the world were built with technology which we even today cannot duplicate. This is a fact cut and dry, it takes 21st century man many weeks to shift a single 200 tonn block of granite with the strongest cranes in the world, the setup to do such a task is mamoth, but at some point in history on our planet, there lived a people who did this by routine, with accuracy that even todays most brilliant stone masons cannot comprehend.
Further evidence of this the Sphynx at Giza, it is undated, though Egyptologysts try to give it a date around 4500 BC, and that is accepted and in all the books, but the truth of the matter is that it is a theoretical view based on some grafiti left there with a Pharoa's name on it, not on sound evidence, and the ego's of the Egyptological world will not hear otherwise, even though there is more evidence against the view. (reminds me of Planet of the apes).
When Geologists studied the weathering on the Sphynx, it was beyond doubt that the weathering was and could only have been caused by rainfall, and rainfall had not fallen in such copious amounts on the Giza plateu since earlier than 10,000 BC, as such there are two explanations... Either there was copious rainfall in Giza for an extended period of hundreds if not thousands of years iin 4500BC (if there were then all the other monuments at Giza would have the same weathering which they do not), or the Sphynx was built when Giza was a green with vegetation and rain was normal... My view is that the stone speaks for itself. The weathering proves the age of the monument is from a time before ours, built with a technology beyond ours.
So in answer to the question, do I believe that anceint humans once had advanced technology... yes.
