I was born 1953 we didn't have any Interesting music on the radio stations until the Beatles came around as a young child I always loved load music with a distinct beat.
Beatles or Rolling Stones Fan, which were/are you?
by eyeslice 48 Replies latest jw friends
-
stopthepain
rolling stones rule
-
heatherg
Depends upon the mood I'm in. Sometimes Beatles, sometimes Stones, and of course Led Zepplin.
-
jeanniebeanz
Stones, but as I was a witness at the time they were really hot, I only discovered them in 93!
Jean
Edited to add: yeah, Zepplin is hot, but Van Halen is better!
-
FlyingHighNow
yeah, Zepplin is hot, but Van Halen is better!
Wow, I never thought I'd see Led Zepplin and Van Halen mentioned in the same sentence, let alone compared.
-
eyeslice
I see Led Zepplin are sort of attempting a take over bid here - I would say they were more on the rebellious side!
Eyeslice
-
new light
Was a huge Beatles fan, but just played it to death. Haven't really given the Stones as much of a chance, but they rock a lot harder. Keith Richards' riffs are pure rock and roll genius.
-
Big Tex
No contest. The Stones were good, but the Beatles were better.
-
FlyingHighNow
I saw George Harrison in his Dark Horse tour in 74. In 75 I was given the chance to see The Stones, but the price I'd have to pay for the date was too high, so I passed on it.