The Cult of Minimus. I like it. Where do I sign up?
(I want purple Kool-Aid)
by jgnat 29 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
The Cult of Minimus. I like it. Where do I sign up?
(I want purple Kool-Aid)
yum
Bav,
I see your point. it helps some people break free in the begining so that is good but even better is to see in a short while that the Bible students are also B S and make further progress in being deprogramed.
tis true frankie, tis true
What got me started on this line of thinking was something that worldlywife said, her husband so obviously conflicted, a draft DA letter sitting on the bureau, yet he was obviously struggling to "keep the faith". I thought, maybe he is fed up with the organization, and truly believes there is "no where else to go". People who are frustrated and trapped are no fun to be around. I would like to think we could suggest alternatives that can help such people move on.
I think that is a noble objective, jgnat. I'm just not sure it is wise to position ourselves as a conduit from "something horrible" to "something else that either is or may become horrible." The real issue at stake is helping the person to become whole and capable again. This means determining whether the person has developed enough spine to walk on their own. If that hasn't happened yet, it would only be a matter of time before they are ensnared again by something or someone else. (James 1:5-8)
Whatever breaks the hold of the WT is a good thing.
Of course, if reading the Bible doesn't make you leave... then will an indepth study of the Great Pyramid?
CZAR
Another alternative, which probably isn't healthy, but may illustrate how their "who else is there?" argument is a non-argument, is the Christadelphians.
Here are some facts on them:
Beliefs that Christadelphians have believed and practiced starting many decades BEFORE 1919 up to the present day (http://www.christadelphian.org.uk/):
Here some practices of the Christadelphians
(http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_delp.htm):
RR is a heavy bible student. and x jw. he did great work here exposing the wt and old wt teachings. he could rip judge rutherFRAUD, into a million little peices, he started trying to preach russellism here for about a month , and got his head handed to him. he acted no different than a jw's defending the fds. only he was defending russell. his true colors came out in the wash. i feel sorry for him. john
If we leave out "healthy," sure they're an alternative for some who leave JWs. There are some whose only complaint is that they can't entertain the heavenly hope without being considered odd balls in the JWs. Some may have read the older literature and think of Russell's time as being like a golden age.
But beware! Russell had some loose strings in his teachings which the Bible Students have never cleared up. In fact, that's why Rutherford had to start making changes, as any succeeding president would have had to do no matter who he was. A Bible Student, then, must live with a certain degree of ambiguity. They don't always agree among themselves, and frictions can arise which are prevented in the more authoritarian WT.
I think, in many respects, it is more difficult for a JW to be re-educated as a Bible Student than someone coming from Christendon, because the two religions are thought to be alike when in many ways they have diverged. Someone who doesn't like self-sacrifice shouldn't attempt it, for it is believed that in order to enter the race for the heavenly kingdom one must make a "covenant of sacrifice" - agreeing not to live a "normal" human life, in exchange for the heavenly life to come. Russell once stated that it's OK for someone not consecrated (or "dedicated") to spend money on strawberries (a delicacy in his day), but the consecrated ones should think twice, as their money is better spent in the Lord's work. So the self-sacrifice is there, but it's not supervised by an organization. In fact, the WT has tricked the Witnesses into living a consecrated life without the heavenly reward in view.
On the positive side, while we frown on 'following a man,' there is something to be said about having a personal saint (such as "the Pastor") as opposed to an impersonal organization. It may be an idealized image of the man, but it is someone who has gone before us and supposedly won the prize. Sort of like Paul - "Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ." (1 Cor. 11:1) As I said, what is an alternative for some is not an alterative for many.