What has puzzled me, one of many things that were not explained, is why wtc7 collapsed into a pile of rubble. This building was never hit by a plane. It had some fires from falling debris. Yet, it collapsed in a way similar to the other two towers.
A while later, i heard a recording of larry silverstein (the owner, i believe) saying that due to the number of lives lost, they had decided to 'pull it', ie they decided to blow it up, and so they did. http://www.infowars.com/Video/911/wtc7_pbs.WMV Very few, if any people died in wtc7. It was empty when it collapsed. Why was it blown up? How could all that explosive be brought in, placed, and wired up in such a short time? What does this say about possibilities for the other two towers?
I also watched over and over vidos of the other two towers falling. In one video, the tower looked as if it was turning to powder as it fell. I ran accross an article that stated that there had been galvanic action in both towers. What that is, is electrical conduction through the steel which deteriorated the concrete. This was helped along by their close proximity to the salty ocean. The study that laid this bare was cancelled and suppressed. Was the 'attack' a blessing in disguise, getting rid of what could have been a huge embarrassment? Was it a blessing in disguise for the neocons who had visions several yrs ago of exactly what they are doing now? Perhaps there is a mighty god; and he is neoconservative and proamerican
S