ellderwho:
Since logical absolutes are conceptual they transcend all people at all times and are absolute in all circumstances.
Lots of things are conceptual but neither transcendent nor absolute. I think you're using vague terms inappropriately either because you're confused or because you're trying to confuse.
However, I believe that logic is universal in that it is nothing more than a way of rearranging information to reveal less obvious information. I'm baffled as to what part of that truism you think requires a god.
This, the atheist cannot account for. But the theist can. Or at least I have an explanation.
No you don't. Or at least nothing you've said so far has come close to qualifying as such.
Observing nature or natural occurances for absolutes cannot be done, since everything that is in nature has not yet been discovered or observed. Then this becomes subjective. And how can you observe something that isnt there.
Again, that makes no sense. I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you. I just don't know what you're trying to say.
The argument you seem to be attempting is something like this:
God is absolute.
Logic is absolute.
Therefore logic comes from God.
Of course the premise "God is absolute" requires you to first prove the existence of God, and then that he is "absolute" whatever that may mean. You haven't done that.
I could accept the second premise if I knew precisely what you meant by "absolute". I'll assume you mean that its existence is necessarily true in any conceivable universe. If so, then I concur.
Your conclusion doesn't follow from your premises. Even if God and logic are both "absolute" and the word means the same in both cases, it does not follow that one requires the other. In fact, if logic is indeed universal as we both seem to believe it would follow that it would exist in exactly the same way whether or not a god existed. Or do you believe that God could create a universe where, for example, all elephants are grey and Jumbo is an elephant but Jumbo is not grey. If you believe he could, then clearly logic is not universal and is simply an artificial construct; alternatively, even God is subject to logic meaning that it can exist without him. So which is it?
Perhaps your right, this might make more sense in a Christian board.
No it wouldn't, but you might find more people willing to gloss over the gaping holes in your argument because they like your conclusions.