Does Camilla Have To Be An Oil Painting Then?

by Englishman 42 Replies latest jw friends

• 

  Mary

  Personally I think it stinks that she can come between a woman and her unfaithful husband for years, claim him and the children after the woman?s death, and then become queen in her stead to boot!

  Bingo. Is this how the Brits think Camilla should be rewarded after being the numero uno culprit in the split up of Charles and Diana's marriage? Ya, this adulterous screwed around on her husband for 20 years, wrecked Chuck and Di's marriage, so let's give the old bag the honorary title of "Her Royal Highness" as punishment. Personally, I can't stand to look at either of them---they make me sick. If I were living in England, I would definitely think that, like his predecessor, Charles should either have to choose the throne, or "the horse woman he loves".

  
• 

  BrendaCloutier

  Now why didn't they get married way back when they first fell in love? I don't quite understand this. Are they too closely related? No. That can't be it... brittish royalty has been inbred for centuries. Hmmm. Now if we could just make an oil painting of George W. Bush and get rid of the "original" we might be doin' ok.
• 

  Valis

  Eman, don't you know you should be conserving oil?
• 

  AshtonCA

  Really, I don't have any issue with Camilla in the looks department. God only knows I'm nothing to write home to mommy about. Personally I think it stinks that she can come between a woman and her unfaithful husband for years, claim him and the children after the woman?s death, and then become queen in her stead to boot! It reeks to high heaven, but that's just one person's opinion.

  I think they were actually an item before he even met Diana, and because Camilla was a commoner, he was not permitted to marry her, so he just kept seeing her all throughout the marriage. I can't remember if Diana knew about her beforehand, but I do think the news did.

  Ash
• 

  IP_SEC

  I agrees with Celia she didnt look half bad when she was younger
• 

  jeanniebeanz

  I think they were actually an item before he even met Diana

  It was cold of her to interfere in Diana's marriage. If Charles did not have the moral fibre necessary to be true to his marriage vows, why in Gods name are they planning on trusting the entire country to him?

  J
• 

  whyamihere

  It was cold of her to interfere in Diana's marriage. If Charles did not have the moral fibre necessary to be true to his marriage vows, why in Gods name are they planning on trusting the entire country to him?

  Well what one mad does in his marriage is his buiness. Don't mix Personal life with your work.

  Also we had Bill Clinton, JFK ect ect ect.

  I love Bill! He is so Hot!

  Brooke
• 

  jeanniebeanz

  Didn't care for Bill or JFK either. Unfaithfullness is so hurtful and scar's so deeply. It's just wrong.

  J
• 

  whyamihere

  It maybe wrong but it is Hillary's and Jackie's Business.

  Brooke
• 

  jeanniebeanz

  We were asked what our issue was with Camilla. I gave my opinion. And you're right, it is the wifes business. But the wife in this case isn't here to stick up for herself, is she?

  J