My Dear,
I read, with great emotion, all of what you wrote. I'm glad you've taken the time to use your own mind and consider what some of the Watchtower opposers have to say. I'm also glad to detect that you have come into a bit of comfort in your recent decision.
Clearly those who frequent this site express a variety of reasons for their unfavorable conclusions about the Watchtower Society. Some of them focus on negative experiences and are openly bitter. While I think they deserve all due consideration for their sufferings, to me such things can indeed be blown entirely out of proportion. All of a sudden people here are making sweeping generalizations suggesting that most all JWs are this or aren’t that, etc. Of course it's true that terrible things happen within the organization of Jehovah's Witnesses, but they happen everywhere else too, don't they? And while it's also true that many men in positions of authority within the organization have used it in ways completely out of harmony with the Bible, such things again have occurred within virtually every group throughout history.
Understand please that my family has been associated with Jehovah's Witnesses for four generations and more than sixty years. I served as an elder, giving talks throughout my state, acting as chairman at conventions and in judicial committees. Despite this, I have come to realize that the WTS is not what it purports to be—only in the last eight months. I’ve done so without an ounce of bitterness toward any of the beautiful friends and fellow elders that were the only community I knew my entire life, nor toward any of the friends who might have been difficult to appreciate at times. Was this easy? I think you know it wasn’t. I had no desire to leave this community. Where on earth would I go? What will life be like? Nonetheless I have made the decision to leave.
I think it comes down to this: Does it matter to you whether it really is the Truth or not? This question is akin to asking, for instance, if you had a terminal illness, would you like to know—or would you rather be kept in the dark as long as possible? For me there is no question about it. I would rather know. As one of Jehovah’s Witnesses, I really believed the teachings. I wasn’t messing around here. This wasn’t just something that satisfied a desire to belong and gave me something to believe in. I’m positive that for some though such is not the case.
I’m wondering if you ever watched the movie, "The Shawshank Redemption," starring Tim Robbins and Morgan Freeman. There was an interesting subplot within the movie involving a character named Brooks Hatlen. He was an elderly prisoner at Shawshank penitentiary who was let out after having spent his entire adult life there. Try as he might, Brooks just couldn’t adjust to life on the outside. He’d become institutionalized. He dwelt on ways he could commit a crime and thus return to the only place where life made sense to him: prison. Was it right for this man to want to return to prison? We wouldn’t want him to, but ultimately it was his decision.
People can be attracted to the reasoning that the WTS publications make. When they begin their study they are encouraged not to believe in a teaching unless they first test it well. You’ll notice though that this recommended testing is restricted to the person’s previously held beliefs, and usually just to a few specific ones, namely the Trinity doctrine, immortality of the soul, and literal torment in hellfire. They come to believe these positions strongly and are amazed at how nearly all of those claiming to be Christian believe in such doctrines! The argumentation is pretty well researched and developed on these things. Because they are so impressed with what they learn, as other teachings follow, they usually accept them pretty much on trust, without requiring the same level of evidence.
They find the opportunity to share these teachings with so many in field service or incidental witnessing that they come to feel that they are the basic doctrines of the Bible, things that form the standard for identification of the one true religion. But if you were to read the scriptures independent of influence, you will find as I did that this is simply not the case. So the average JW is well equipped to talk about the Trinity, the soul or hellfire—things that the Bible writers were never inspired to develop—but why can’t they ably discuss what Paul wrote about so strongly about salvation by faith and not works in his letter to the Romans?
I think you’re like me, in that we are able to forgive people for the things big or small they may have done against us. And we don’t want to condemn as wicked a whole group of people for the things that some of them have done. But what can’t be excused is what the leadership of this organization has done—and continues to do. They are part of a legacy of men that have proclaimed themselves the sole channel of communication from God to the rest of the planet. Their claim that the "faithful and discreet slave" Jesus mentioned at Matthew 24:14 refers to a class of people is utterly without foundation in God’s word. Every other reference to Christian "stewardship" shows very clearly that all of us
are expected to act as "stewards." Note how 1 Peter 4:10 & 11 reads…
"In proportion as each one has received a gift, use it in ministering to one another as fine stewards of God’s undeserved kindness expressed in various ways."
For them to assume this role is quite a remarkable thing. Have you really ascertained why it is that you are willing to recognize them as such? I mean, why exactly? Are you really satisfied that the scriptures support the idea that a group of men should be in the position they’ve assumed over others?
Furthermore, are you satisfied their assertion that 1914 was when Jesus sat down on his throne is accurate? Are you aware that they themselves have known for more than thirty years that the dates used to determine this teaching are in error? Does it matter to you that they continue to teach them anyway, hiding this fact from their adherents? Or that when a faithful, well-intentioned elder shows them the mind-boggling abundance of evidence of the error they threaten him to keep quiet about it or face disfellowshipping?
You write, "
A WT quote from years ago... 'Negative thinking requires little of the intellect." Oh how true! Easiest thing in the world..."
But do you apply the same principle to the "negative thinking" the Watchtower Society uses against every other religion—as well as anyone who simply disagrees with a single doctrinal point they’ve asserted? Anyone who does this is lambasted by them as "a self-styled teacher," "prideful," "concoct[ing] their own ideas," who use "smooth, deceptive speech" and who only want "to destroy the faith." But faith in what? Jesus Christ and Jehovah? Or in their own authority?
You also write, "In the end.. you have to make a choice, just make sure it is a choice... not just a rection against your pain, or your circumstances. Fear is very powerful. Faith is more powerful..".
And I say to you, dear sister, in making your choice, please make sure it is a one made by a rational mind—and not an emotional choice born out of having been institutionalized. It will feel good to be able to say to other Witnesses after you are reinstated, "Yes, I actually started reading those apostate message boards for awhile, but I came back to Jehovah anyway." But what is really at the heart of your decision to return? Because you think you’ll be happier? Or because you truly believe it is the truth?
Unlike the WTS, the people here will not demonize you for choosing a course different from ours. But also unlike the WTS we will not discourage you from looking at all the information. You are invited to do so.
Much Love