Good post. I first realized this problem when I was 7 or 8 years old, when I was first learning the JW teachings.
We have had several great threads in the past on this subject. The other important thing to remember is that the Jewish (especially, Pharisee) and early Christian concept of the resurrection posited an intermediate period between death and resurrection in which the person still exists (that is, there is CONTINUITY), and it is in the resurrection that each person will be judged for the deads of their former life (the wicked receiving punishment, the righteous receiving blessedness). The concept of Judgment Day makes no sense for a newly created "clone" to be judged for the deeds the clone's predecessor had made. The JWs circumvent this problem by claiming that the Millennium is Judgment Day, but this is an ad hoc explanation that has no basis in the NT itself; e.g. Revelation, which is the only place in the Bible where the concept of a Millennium appears, states that the general resurrection occurs AFTER the Millennium is over.
It is the Sadducean view (akin to Greek Epicurean philosophy) that posited that there was no soul or afterlife, but it was the Sadducees who ALSO rejected the belief in the resurrection. The Society's rejection of the existence of any continuity between the resurrected person and the person who died essentially approximates the Sadducean point of view, but grafts it onto the biblical (Pharisee) belief of the resurrection. The compromise is an unbiblical belief in recreation, which the Society calls "resurrection", but bears no resemblence with the actual Jewish and Christian theories of resurrection. BTW, the Pharisee/Christian concept of the resurrection (which is focused on restored embodiment) must be distinguished from the Platonic immortality of the soul concept (which is focused on disembodiment as an ideal), but they are similar in both positing that there is some essence that survives death and would be restored to life. Thus, Paul uses Platonic terminology in certain passages (especially 2 Corinthians 5, 12), to refer to the "nakedness" of death, leaving the "tent" of the body, and being "out of the body" or "away from the body".
Bear in mind too that the two words referring to resurrection in the NT employ metaphors of being "awakened" or "standing up again", both conceptually dependent on a notion of a resurrected person being the same person as the one who had died (who is being awakened or standing up again). The metaphors used by Paul in 1 Corinthians 15 also stress continuity; what is sown is what is raised, the resurrected person is like a glorious plant growing from the seed buried in the ground.
Also, don't forget that since Jesus Christ was resurrected in the same manner, the "resurrected Christ" is also in WT doctrine a recreated "clone".