quote from the elders' handbook:
Handling Judicial Cases
Do not send an individual any kind of correspondence that directly accuses him of specific wrongdoing.
It is best for two elders to speak with the indlvidual and invite him to meet with the Judicial committee. Suitable arrangements should be made as to the time and place of the hearing. State what the person's course of action is supposed to have been. If it is necessary to send a written invitation, you should simply state what the individual's course is alleged to have been, the time and place of the hearing, and how theperson can contact the chairman if the arrangements are inconvenient for him. If the accused wishes to bring witnesses who can speak in his defense regarding the matter, he may do so. However, observers are not permitted. No tape-recording devices are allowed. If the accused reeatedly fails to come to the hearing, the committee will proceed with the hearing but will not make a decision until evidence and any testimony by witnesses are considered. The committee should not take action against a person unless the evidence clearly proves this necessary. Failure to appear before the committee is not in itself proof of guilt. What kind of evidence is acceptable? There must be two or three eyewitnesses, not just persons repeating what they have heard; no action can be taken if there is only one witness. (Deut. 19:15;Jol1ll 8:17) Confession (admission of wrongdoing), either written or oral, may be accepted as conclusive proof without other corroborating evidence. (Josh. 7:19) Strong circumstantial evidence, such as pregnancy or evidence (testified to by at least two witnesses) that the accused stayed all night in the same house with a person of
the opposite sex (or in the same house with a known homosexual ) under improper circumstances, is acceptable.
The testimony of youths may be considered; it is up to the elders to determine if the testimony has the ring of truth.
The testimony of unbelievers may also be considered, but it must be carefully weighed.
If there are two or three witnesses to the same kind of wrongdoing but each one is witness to a separate incident, their testimony can be considered.
Such evidence may be used to establish guilt, but it is preferable to have two witnesses to the same occurrence of wrongdoing. ...
Inform the wrongdoer that he may appeal in writing ithin seven days if he feels a serious error in judgment as occurred. (om p. 147; km 1/80 p. 4)
If I were you, I'd write a letter to the elders stating you are appealing their decision because:
1) They did not invite you to the JC.
2) They did not notify you of the decision to DF.
CC the WTS!