“Laika”: “I agree with bluesbrother, you can believe something is true and still lie in support of your belief.”
Depends in what context a person can “lie” – relative to themselves or to others.
If (theoretically, of course) I honestly and completely believe that I am from the planet “Poopiepants,” and I tell you that I am from the planet Poopiepants, then technically I’m not really “lying” in the classic sense of lying. Even though it’s not actually and literally true that I’m from the planet Poopiepants, if I consciously believe that I am, then I’m not “lying” to you as far as myself is concerned, because I’m not consciously lying to myself. (Don’t bother looking for “Poopiepants” on Wikipedia – I made it up.) If I actually believe that I’m from the planet Poopiepants, due to some enigmatic pathological condition, then theoretically I could successfully pass a lie detector test. (Or at least the classical type of lie detector test. I’m not so sure about the electronic real-time observational techniques used directly on the brain, such as the magnetic resonance imaging type – or is it the single photon emission tomography thing. Something like that. I’m not sure.)
There’s the example of the alcoholic who, during his lucid, rational phase, says that he has firmly decided, just on his own willpower, to never drink again. Apparently such a person could at that moment actually pass a classic lie detector test, because he literally and absolutely believes his own convictions. But by his eventual and predictable relapse, he will end up betraying his own tangible and literal perception of reality as to the development of his future course of action which he was so absolutely sure of at the present moment. Thus, such an alcoholic keeps literally and honestly betraying himself.
“frankiespeakin”:
“These guys on the Governing Body . . . because they have to activate the mental defence mechanism of deception they force themselves to believe their bullshit because if they don't they know they will get found out by the other guys on the GB, so they all put on a show for each other in proving their loyalty to the cause . . .”
Good observation. This really reminds me of those border guards along North Korea’s demilitarized zone. They are arranged in pairs who must stand facing each other. The reason for this is that if one of those guards starts to have any ideas about defecting and making a run for it, his partner facing him will quickly be able to detect it and easily be able to shoot him before he barely has a chance to turn and run at all.
It’s as though the members of the Governing Body are all in a state of checkmate with each other, and they must remain in-placing towing their party line, otherwise, if they dare to move out of line, they will be spiritually and socially “shot to death.”
Psychology certainly is a fascinating thing – just what really does make people “tick.”