http://tsdr.uspto.gov/#casenumber=85896124&casetype=serial_no&searchtype=statussearch.
even though watchtower's application has been rejected, they will be allowed to use the logo because it is for religious usage and will not be confused with commercial products.. the trademark office did note this:.
indeed, numerous other marks are registered reflecting the letters j and w:.
“AlphaMan”: “Why would Jehovah's "holy spirit" lead the Organization to develop the awe-inspiring JW.Org logo for trademark approval and not even have the foresight to see the TM Office would disprove it?”
Exactly!!!
“AndDontCallMeShirley”: “Plan B: change the logo to what is really desired: "GB.Org".”
That’s really about it!
do you think they are zealous?.
happy, joyful?.
pessimistic, depressed?.
“WTWizard" has a good point regarding people’s propensity to “cross-reference things.” This, in the end, will be the significant deciding factor, regardless of whatever vibes are attempted to be pushed down the pike from the WTS pedestal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/dead_parrot_sketch.
inspired by a car salesman.
as with john cleese's apoplectic performance, there is never any admission that the "preaching" work, door to door in particular, is dead and has been for some time.
As far as a “tipping point,” I would think that it could only apply to each JW on an individual basis, and perhaps eventually to the entire rank-and- file JW community as a whole (long way off, though – don’t hold your breath). But as for any major “tipping point” on the core policies of the WTS (blood, disfellowshipping, beards, birthdays, etc.), I can’t really see it happening. I think the whole WT enterprise would be forced to either change or be shut down by the government (can anybody say “1918”?) before the WTS would change their draconian measures on their own.
the watchtower study to be considered this sunday, august 3, 2014 (using the magazine dated may 15, 2014), titled are you moving ahead with jehovahs organization?, in paragraph seven (on pages 27-28), talks about the number of people baptized in recent years:.
7 where do those making up the great crowd come from?
they are being brought together because of what jesus foretold as part of the sign of his presence.
“darkspilver”: “ So let's apply the KISS theory - Keep It Simple, Stupid! ”
I like that! There’s really nothing like elegant simplicity to cut through all the convoluted bullsh^t.
You, sir, get the “Captain Obvious” award for this one! (You know, that guy in the marine captain’s uniform on the “Hotels.com” commercials – he’s priceless.)
in the past few weeks, my wife has been seeing more and more the lack of love and caring from jws.
for example, she is organizing a "princess party" for our 4 year old daughter.
a couple of the parents have expressed reservations about this since they think princesses may be "too magical" even though we know they have been to disneyworld, and watch the disney channel.
“Mum”: “. . . talk to her about the characters in the book you're reading, describe their struggles, and make those struggles sound like the same kind of problems JW's have to deal with.”
An excellent new thought-provoking fictional book, which has strong similarities and some actual references to Russell, Rutherford, and Franz, is by our own Terry Walstrom, called “The Monorails of Mars.” That would be a great book for breaking the ice with your wife, as it is provocative yet fairly non-threatening. It is available on Amazon and Lulu:
http://www.amazon.com/The-Monorails-Mars-Terry-Walstrom/dp/131236033X
http://www.lulu.com/shop/terry-walstrom/the-monorails-of-mars/paperback/product-21717981.html
do you think they are zealous?.
happy, joyful?.
pessimistic, depressed?.
Well, “minimus,” with this 100-year anniversary of the supposed “kingdom rule” (quite a kingdom!), many JWs will be on a little bit of a high, largely thanks to the current WTS propaganda, but as this current centenarian milestone passes, the “reset” button will be pressed in the minds of most of the folks, only to await the next little “motivation” which happens to come along down the corporate pike.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/dead_parrot_sketch.
inspired by a car salesman.
as with john cleese's apoplectic performance, there is never any admission that the "preaching" work, door to door in particular, is dead and has been for some time.
“BucketShopBill”: “Will they start using Nigerian Prince Scams to collect more money?”
Actually, in a manner of speaking, they have already done that: Brother Federick W Franz, at a convention in New York, in 1950, referring to the “great multitude,” the “sheep” of Matthew chapter 25, and the “Jonadab class” of 2 Kings chapter 10, asked the audience: “Would this international assembly be interested to know that HERE, TONIGHT, in our midst, there are a number of prospective PRINCES OF THE NEW EARTH?”
And so, the scam continues – good-boy, butt-kissing elders apparently have the prospect of becoming, not just elders, but princes in the panda-petting new world™.
i've been browsing the site for some time as things that the society teach just are not adding up much these days.
by exploring some of the threads on here i'm starting to see why.
a brief bio.
“purrpurr”: “. . . yet again it just seems like the GB are just trying to explain why the new system isn't here yet. . . . the society says that its good that it hasn't come yet because more people have had the chance to come into the truth. . . .”
I think that the post by “Magnum” (on page one of this thread) answers that pretty well: “In fact, since more people are being born today than they were a few decades ago, there will actually be MORE who don't get a chance than there would have been then.”
“disposable hero of hypocrisy”: “I've had lots of tiny doubts for decades ( trumpet blasts = ohio convention, flip floppery about sodom and gomorrah, dodgy explanations of 'generations, really? ) but I've come to the point of not believing any of it now. But I'm still in. Got good friends and family, at the moment the cost of keeping them is keeping my mouth shut and attending some meetings, while doing a very token ministry. Fair price at the moment for me(other reasons apply too).”
That sure sounds like my own current situation exactly!
some people wonder if others' beliefs should not be challenged--just leave them alone--do not be a "voice of reason".. what's the harm of belief?what's the harm of not thinking critically?
here are 365,632 people who were harmed by someone not thinking critically.what's the harm of believing in medicine that doesn't work?
368,379 people killed, 306,096 injured and over $2,815,931,000 in economic damages what's the harm in not being vaccinated?
“What's the harm in believing in falsehoods?”
Not really anything – as long as you can tell the difference!
Example:
• Mickey Mouse, Daffy Duck, the Smurfs, unicorns, leprechauns, etc.: FALSEHOODS – But doesn’t matter because we all know it’s just “fantasy” (except young kids).
• Jehovah’s Witnesses/Watchtower, Mormons, Scientologists, Moonies, Branch Dividians, Heaven’s Gate, etc.: FALSEHOODS – But disturbing, because some folks are actually brainwashed and ensnared by them! (Not to mention many lives, including babies, lost.)
the watchtower study to be considered this sunday, august 3, 2014 (using the magazine dated may 15, 2014), titled are you moving ahead with jehovahs organization?, in paragraph seven (on pages 27-28), talks about the number of people baptized in recent years:.
7 where do those making up the great crowd come from?
they are being brought together because of what jesus foretold as part of the sign of his presence.
“jwfacts”: “They want to believe, so look for the positives. They assume whatever it was you said must be positive, because no one ever is brave enough to express otherwise.”
“Listener”: “. . . they just provide the number of publishers at any given time, which includes people who are unbaptized. This would suggest that they are not really interested in acknowledging the number of people who have dedicated their lives to God but they are interested in knowing the numbers of those people that are working for their organization.”
Very astute and insightful comments, guys! It only goes to show the organization’s true motives, and that its membership wants to believe in it at all costs.
